To: Siegfried The Red
Good talking points, but many scientists do think ID is science. It's funny how the Darwin Fundies in the trial never addressed the science that the ID supporters presented.
To: truthfinder9
"It's funny how the Darwin Fundies in the trial never addressed the science that the ID supporters presented."
And specifically what science would that be?
32 posted on
12/20/2005 12:36:53 PM PST by
ndt
To: truthfinder9
It's funny how the Darwin Fundies in the trial never addressed the science that the ID supporters presented. And it's freaking hilarious how the Genesis worshipers here never address how the "scientists [who] think ID is science" believe in evolution (including "descent from the ape") and testified to that at the Dover trial
40 posted on
12/20/2005 12:44:49 PM PST by
Oztrich Boy
(so natural to mankind is intolerance in whatever they really care about - J S Mill)
To: truthfinder9
It's funny how the Darwin Fundies in the trial never addressed the science that the ID supporters presented.That's because there wasn't any science to address.
41 posted on
12/20/2005 12:45:20 PM PST by
RonF
To: truthfinder9
Appeal to numbers. If "many" scientists think this, then it still doesn't matter. "Many" of them are wrong.
89 posted on
12/20/2005 1:12:59 PM PST by
Siegfried The Red
(Subgeniuses are the last TRUE Americans!)
To: truthfinder9
"but many scientists do think ID is science."
The court decision [available online] addresses your point in great detail - there are not many scientists thinking ID is a science, and those few who might are dubious scientists.
156 posted on
12/20/2005 7:12:56 PM PST by
GSlob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson