[Oztrich Boy]

It's funny how the Darwin Fundies in the trial never addressed the science that the ID supporters presented.

And it's freaking hilarious how the Genesis worshipers here never address how the "scientists [who] think ID is science" believe in evolution (including "descent from the ape") and testified to that at the Dover trial

[truthfinder9]

For those of you who don't actually follow science, gentics in recent years has been showing that man and "apes" aren't related. Look it up.

[jdsteel]

It's funny how the Darwin Fundies in the trial never addressed the science that the ID supporters presented.

I don't care much for teaching ID myself. What I WOULD like to see in a science class is the parts about the THEORY of evolution that have gaps and unanswered questions (there are quite a few). That is why it is referred to as scientific theory, not a scientific LAW (such as the law of gravity). I've seen quotes in the MSM that said the theory of evolution is as well established as the "theory of gravity". It's the LAW of gravity, not the theory. There is a big difference in science between theory and law. Why can't science classes spend a little time on that?

[onja]

They aren't the only scientists who believe in ID. Duh. We aren't saying that all scientists who believe ID is science believe in creationsim. But there are plenty of scientists who believe ID is science and believe in creationism.