Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind

What's wrong with optically scanned paper ballots? They are accurate, easy to use and provide an good option for hand recounts.


7 posted on 12/20/2005 9:35:22 AM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MediaMole

Then when the RATS lose the election, bags of vote can be "found".


11 posted on 12/20/2005 9:38:12 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: MediaMole

Our county uses those. No problems here........Panhandle Florida.......


12 posted on 12/20/2005 9:38:40 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: MediaMole
What's wrong with optically scanned paper ballots? They are accurate, easy to use and provide an good option for hand recounts.

Your question answers itself.

17 posted on 12/20/2005 9:43:42 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: MediaMole
What's wrong with optically scanned paper ballots? They are accurate, easy to use and provide an good option for hand recounts.

That's what we do in Toronto (not sure about the rest of Canada) and it works fine. Paper ballots if a recount is needed and results moments after the polls close.

41 posted on 12/20/2005 10:30:31 AM PST by mitchbert (Facts Are Stubborn Things .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson