Have you read the whole ruling [available online]? I have, and I do not consider his ruling bizarre in the least. Quite the opposite, I consider it right and proper. If anything, by going into a long consideration of the nature and history of ID and concluding that whatever else it might be, science it is not, the judge did yeoman's work for other judges who might have to sort out future cases. ID belongs in a seminary, or in a sunday school. It has no place in the science class of a public school.
Sadly, you are wrong. The judge's description of ID is wrong, and his bias against any threat to Darwinism is mis-guided. I am not going to revisit the long debates about whether ID is religion or science. It is pointless. Suffice to say, this is not the last that you will hear of ID.