Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't recall much discussion of this before the legislature passed it. While I suppose it's possible that it's just media spin, this law sounds pretty offensive to me.

-Eric

1 posted on 12/20/2005 3:15:37 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Las Vegas Dave; dubyaismypresident; MikeinIraq; TonyRo76; DollyCali

-Eric

2 posted on 12/20/2005 3:19:06 AM PST by E Rocc (Bah Humbug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc

AFAIK, most states already have laws requiring you to identify yourself to the police when asked.


3 posted on 12/20/2005 3:19:09 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc
One state representative said it resembles Gestapo-style tactics of government

Not even the second sentence, and the Nazi reference comes out.

4 posted on 12/20/2005 3:20:53 AM PST by Old Sarge (In a Hole in the Ground, there Lived a Fobbit...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc

I could be wrong, but I believe the USSC has already ruled that you can be taken into custody for failing to provide your name to the police.


6 posted on 12/20/2005 3:21:52 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc
While I suppose it's possible that it's just media spin

Is the MSM also against voter ID? (Just curious.)

8 posted on 12/20/2005 3:27:36 AM PST by Las Vegas Dave ("Liberals out of power are comical-Liberals in power are dangerous!"-Rush Limbaugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc
The lengthy piece of legislation would let police arrest people in public places who will not give their names, address and birth dates, even if they are not doing anything wrong.

Failure to provide identification has been an offense everywhere I have lived, but the suspect had to be engaged in suspicious or illegal activity – like hanging around a recent crime scene, loitering etc. It would result in a night in jail.
I couldn’t find the article on the link provided, but are there higher penalties provided by the proposal?
9 posted on 12/20/2005 3:35:13 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc

Hopefully this can also be used to boot some of the illegals out of Ohio and out of the country.


11 posted on 12/20/2005 3:40:31 AM PST by Buffettfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc

"It brings us frighteningly close to a show me your papers society," said Carrie Davis of the ACLU, which opposes the Ohio Patriot Act.

If the ACLU is aggainst it,in reality it's probably something much needed by law enforcement. I'm not falling for any of this liberal spin. Nothing is going to outlaw or take away due process in this country. Considering that there are plenty of terror cells already in Ohio I hope Taft signs this one today.


12 posted on 12/20/2005 3:41:25 AM PST by Warrior_Queen ("The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc
"The variety of people who opposed to this is not just a group of the usual suspects. We have people far right to the left opposing the bill who think it is a bad idea," said Al McGinty, NewsChannel5’s terrorism expert.

In other words, the people who want to preserve individual liberties are those who actually use them.

14 posted on 12/20/2005 3:50:07 AM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc
The lengthy piece of legislation would let police arrest people in public places who will not give their names, address and birth dates, even if they are not doing anything wrong.

What is the injury and who is the injured party? "Protect and serve" is being replaced by "enforcing the law", under the rubric of stopping terrorism.

The day will come when FReepers will be considered "terrorists".

17 posted on 12/20/2005 3:56:08 AM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc
"this law sounds pretty offensive to me."

Indeed,

the republican legacy has now expanded to include; waste, fraud, massive tax increases, corruption, cronyism, stupidity, and now unconstitutional attacks on our basic god-given rights.

Never again.

19 posted on 12/20/2005 4:52:58 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc

Allowing people to be arrested for "no reason" is not correct. Here is the relevant section and link to the bill ( http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=126_SB_9 ).


Sec. 2921.29. (A) No person who is in a public place shall refuse to disclose the person's name, address, or date of birth, when requested by a law enforcement officer who reasonably suspects either of the following:

(1) The person is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a criminal offense.

(2) The person witnessed any of the following:

(a) An offense of violence that would constitute a felony under the laws of this state;

(b) A felony offense that causes or results in, or creates a substantial risk of, serious physical harm to another person or to property;

(c) Any attempt or conspiracy to commit, or complicity in committing, any offense identified in division (A)(2)(a) or (b) of this section;

(d) Any conduct reasonably indicating that any offense identified in division (A)(2)(a) or (b) of this section or any attempt, conspiracy, or complicity described in division (A)(2)(c) of this section has been, is being, or is about to be committed.

(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of failure to disclose one's personal information, a misdemeanor of the fourth degree.

(C) Nothing in this section requires a person to answer any questions beyond that person's name, address, or date of birth. Nothing in this section authorizes a law enforcement officer to arrest a person for not providing any information beyond that person's name, address, or date of birth or for refusing to describe the offense observed.

(D) It is not a violation of this section to refuse to answer a question that would reveal a person's age or date of birth if age is an element of the crime that the person is suspected of committing.


27 posted on 12/20/2005 8:37:15 AM PST by Dr. Free Market (Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc; freepatriot32

Just as I suspected, the freedom-hating totalitarians are out on FR today.
Ping, you're not gonna like this one.


29 posted on 12/20/2005 9:10:34 AM PST by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc

As long as it pisses off the ACLU, it is OK by me.


31 posted on 12/20/2005 9:27:20 AM PST by verity (The MSM is a National disgrace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
Check out the number of small less intrusive government freedom loving FReepers that support this law.Its absolutly disgusting. Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
34 posted on 12/20/2005 1:26:18 PM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Corporate Law

ping


39 posted on 12/20/2005 7:54:22 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc
Seems natural that a law such as this would be introduced first in Ohio.

Of the several states I have lived any significant time in, from my own perspective Ohio had the most "Big Brotherly", anti-individual, and pro-government bureacracy feel to it when compared to either Missouri, Kansas, North Carolina, Arizona, Texas or Connecticut. Can't speak of any other states because I haven't lived in others.

One of those hard to explain, but odd feelings anytime I had to any interaction with the state or local officials.

41 posted on 12/20/2005 8:24:34 PM PST by Lloyd227 (and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc

What are you afraid of? Do you have something to hide? Don't you want the government to keep you safe???!!??

Are you a RINO?

sarcasm...in case you didn't get it


47 posted on 12/20/2005 8:39:57 PM PST by DLfromthedesert (Texas Cowboy...graduated to Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc

53 posted on 12/20/2005 8:47:25 PM PST by An Old Man (USMC 1956 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne; Alia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1543849/posts

This is one of the reasons, I do not subscribe blindly to the face value of the Patriot Act as written.

Any sane citizen will never give this broad of a power to the Government, in the name of fighting terrorism.
BTW a provision to restrict US citizens the right to purchase fire arms, was also inserted in the Bill of Goods, courtesy of your friendly Patriot Act!

Never thrust your Government under ANY circumstances!...Period!

No, I am not a Libertarian, just a very skeptical and pragmatical Joe Sixpack.

67 posted on 12/21/2005 7:53:52 PM PST by danmar ("Reason obeys itself,and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it....... Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson