Isn`t America lucky to have your clear view of the world. Oh, by the way, how did you spend your tax cut?
Tax cut?
Tax cuts come and go. Considering the mega-fat spending spree and global welfare giveaways Bush has orchestrated, the more likely scenario when the RATs gain power soon will be more of the "go version", not more "come".
On the other side of the ledger, spending never "goes". Once started, it is like a cancer. Example, take President Bush's $15 BILLION blank check to Africa that maintains female genital mutilation and bad sex practices, rapes of young girls, etc. (because we did not demand they clean up their butcher-like rituals before the blank check was sent). Once that $15 BILLION is flittered away to various warlords and corrupt officials, you will see a renewal like it was on autopilot, and will see a 100% increase to $30 BILLION, more than likely. Bush has had a habit of increasing many welfare plans by 50% to 200%, not your standard 2-3% or close to inflation like many past presidents have done. If Bush is not in power when the renewal comes up, it is anybody's guess what the RAT Marxists will do.
Now be real, do you honestly believe the tax cuts will stay? Think of the RATs gaining power which they will do, and think of the debt, the deficit, the ranting the RATs have done about the tax cut, the Medicare spending boom and Social Security boom from the baby boomers retiring, the illegal alien free medical care and housing etc. (the 15 million illegal aliens will have three to four kids each over the next six years so make that about 60 million, not even counting the new invaders headed our way), think of California going bankrupt which they will, think of the cost of the war, the threats from Iran and North Korea, think of China's massive military buildup, the growing percentage of the total budget devoted to social welfare, currently at 67% projected out, compared to JFK's 30%, . . .
Now c'mon . . . you do not seriously believe that with that backdrop, the tax cut will stay. I know you do not. I know that, once you ponder all the above, you will realize your "tax cit" example was a lame point. Yes, the tax cut was right and a check mark in the positive side of the ledger for Bush, but his tax cut is temporary but his spending precedent was permanent. That is the way spending works in Washington. Bush's stratospheric increases to existing social programs, and his new social programs with huge starting budgets have created "new baselines" for the RATs to leapfrog from.
C'mon now. Ponder all this and realize "tax cut" just does not make it as an offset to all the negatives.