Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boris
The answer is nuclear power. With sufficient cheap energy, any amount of synfuels can be manufactured.

You could have a nuclear-powered locomotive, too, with a closed-cycle gas-turbine engine.

25 posted on 12/19/2005 6:56:28 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel

I'll take two!


26 posted on 12/19/2005 8:39:14 AM PST by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
It would be enormous. Imagine a train wreck with a nuclear loco. I happen to live about a mile from a major rail line and frequently wonder how the folks whose houses are right up next to it can stand the noise. Imagine the NIMBY reaction to a nuclear locomotive. To carry enough shielding would result in gigantism. Familiarize yourself with the technical issues that killed the nuclear airplane and look into Project Pluto. You might even look at the studies of the outcomes of a crash of a nuclear aircraft. Double-plus ungood.

--Boris

27 posted on 12/19/2005 5:35:55 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson