Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

More publicity for Richardson. But, as the article shows, even the press is questioning use of the state plane such that officals are now providing details and taking pains to say "only" $4,500 of state money was spent on the trip.

Perception is everything, and this does not make Richardson look good.

1 posted on 12/18/2005 2:28:42 PM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CedarDave
Big deal about a cheap little jet--Branson probably owns a dozen.

re: Richardson said he wants New Mexico to commit $100 million to start building the spaceportin 2007.)))

eek. Why does this have to be a state-funded venture?

2 posted on 12/18/2005 2:31:13 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CedarDave

Just out of curiosity, how much fuel does that Citation burn?


3 posted on 12/18/2005 2:31:56 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CedarDave

Hey ya gotta spend money to make money...


4 posted on 12/18/2005 2:32:18 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CedarDave
No state money was used - read it again.

One of my pet peeves is when folks complain about air force one (slightly off topic). We own the plane, we pay the crew, the crew must fly, who cares what the president uses it for?

In addition, it is a communications node - Bush with AF one in tow is much better than Bush without.

5 posted on 12/18/2005 2:33:51 PM PST by patton ("Hard Drive Cemetary" - forthcoming best seller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CedarDave

Well, the article claims that Branson's company paid for the fuel and a state board covered the rest of the cost through private donations. If this is true (who is it that is donating $4500 to fly a billionaire around in a private jet?) then it's a wash for the taxpayers, and it's better for the airplane to be used than to sit.

What I don't understand is why Branson didn't just charter a jet. It's not like he or his company can't afford it. This way just made the NM government look silly because (at least as per this thread) some people won't read the article carefully and think the state is paying to fly Branson around.


7 posted on 12/18/2005 2:48:58 PM PST by Turbopilot (Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CedarDave

I think that the most viable future to space exploration is private enterprise which seems to be Branson's aim; that being said, why does the state feel the need to spend $100 million on a space port (and state estimates usually wind WAY LOW), if Branson feels he can make use of a space port he should fund it himself.


11 posted on 12/18/2005 3:11:55 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson