Posted on 12/17/2005 3:58:48 PM PST by Vermonter
SETI@Home Project Ends
For years, volunteers shared idle CPU cycles to analyze interstellar data. Phil Hochmuth, Network World Friday, December 16, 2005
Along with the Howard Stern Show, another radio endeavor involving alien life forms is going off the air this week; SETI@Home, a grid supercomputer project for detecting signs of extra terrestrial life from deep space, officially ended December 15.
"We'll be shutting down the "SETI@home Classic" project on December 15," read an e-mail sent by SETI@Home administrators at the University of California at Berkeley, where the project started in 1999. "The workunit totals of users and teams will be frozen at that point, and the final totals will be available on the Web."
The Search for Extra Terrestrial Life at Home (SETI@Home) project harness idle CPU cycles from millions of Internet-connected PCs across the globe in order to analyze data collected from massive radio telescopes. Running in place of a screensaver, the SETI@Home software, when downloaded on a PC, collected raw data from a centralized SETI@Home server bank and searched for patterns that might signal intelligent life--possible E.T., TV shows, radio communications, or other signals.
Other Applications Although the program ran as a screensaver the collective computing power was enormous; 2 million years of accumulated CPU time, and over 50 terabytes of data, or "workunits," parsed. More than 5 million users have downloaded the software, according to the project organizers.
The project also became a kind of competition for PC hobbyists known as "overclockers" who tweak their systems to run as fast as possible and use SETI@Home workunits to measure system performance and claim bragging rights.
But like the Stern show, SETI@Home will live on in another form. The project is being moved to the Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC), an open-source grid project using the same principles as the original project. BOINC will continue the search for E.T. radio signals, but a new client also allows users to devote spare CPU power for other research projects, such as climate change, astronomy, and curing human diseases.
Other such researchers have also adopted the SETI@Home approach for research projects that benefit from large amounts of computing power.
Join the FR Folding@Home team
http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=teampage&teamnum=36120
we need more computers to get into the Top1000 teams
While Seti was useless, Folding@Home is a very worthy cause.
Download the software and sign up on the Folding@Home website: http://folding.stanford.edu
FreeRepublic's team number is 36120
http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/team_display.php?teamid=2801 for Freepers on Einstein.
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30594 for Freepers on SETI
BOINC?
Sounds like a worthy adversary for Austen Powers.
Who, or what, is "Nutten?"
And your grammer is horrible.
Seriously, as I just posted on another thread on another topic
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Because you haven't found evidence of something doesn't mean it's not there. You can suggest it and you have as much possibility of being right as being wrong. If you insist that it "must be the case" then you are being foolish.
SETI and looking for little green men aside this was a pretty cool approach to technology and processing a lot of work with spare cycles.
YEC INTREP
They need a new IT group. They put up BOINC about 18 months ago. I found it to be nothing but trouble. Couldn't
download units, couldn't up units. The USENET group had some lame explanation about that it was a "beta" test.
Nothing about asking people to test it on the website. Just a "new" label.
Any way, I went back to the classic. For various reasons, I stopped processing last Spring. I started up again early
December. Same dang thing with BOINC. Once I got units, I couldn't upload them. Another excuse: "We're switching over
the classic users...overload...blah blah blah"
There are other problems. I'm finishing up what I have for units and probably giving up on them again. It's hard
to believe that they're not a government project.
ping
Agreed. BOINC is not intuitive nor user friendly for the average user IMHO.
I have no desire to fool with it.
bump
Bump. I'm an ex SETI junkie. Now, almost 200 FReepers are "Folding one for the Gipper"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1577197/posts
Join us!
My exact same experience. It was fun while I had the classic going. I had one pc do SETI and another with some sort of Folding. They were my "Computers for the Benefit of Mankind" sitting in a corner that got quite a few laughs.
Did you all get one of these?
SETI@home needs your help. But before we tell you why - and how you can help - Dan and I would like to thank you for your role in the SETI@home success story.
We would first like to thank you for your participation in SETI@home. During the first SETI@home project you personally assisted us by searching for extraterrestrial signals in 3301 data chunks and providing 3.205 years of computing time. We want you to know we appreciate your efforts and the efforts of the other 5.4 million volunteers who have donated over 2.4 million years of processing time. When we started, people thought our projection of 100,000 users to be overly optimistic! You helped us prove that public participation in scientific computing could work. You also helped us to see that this type of community effort deserved to be more common. That's why we developed the Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing or BOINC. BOINC has the benefit of allowing our volunteers the option of sharing their processing power with other worthy projects in addition to SETI@home. These projects range from looking for gravitational waves to searching for cures to diseases.
But all these successes are just a beginning. As you are aware, SETI@home has successfully transitioned to operating under BOINC. Because of this, new searches are on the horizon for SETI@home. We are releasing a new version of our processing software that increases the sensitivity of our search by a factor of two or more. We are building and installing a new data recorder at Arecibo. This data recorder operates in conjunction with a newly installed receiver that has the capability to observe seven places on the sky simultaneously. It also increases our sensitivity by another factor of five. These increases in sensitivity mean that SETI@home will have capability of detecting signals that are three times more distant than we could before. The region of space we can search will expand by a factor of thirty. That's thirty times the chance that your computer will detect that faint signal from another star.
This increase in capability isn't without cost. Following the "dot com" bust, the commercial support that kept SETI@home running has largely disappeared. Because of this loss of support, we can no longer count on matching funds from the University of California. We are rapidly approaching the end of what funds we do have. We we will need to raise about $750,000 to pay for these new capabilities and to keep SETI@home operating for the next year. Without this support SETI@home may be forced to shut down.
We hope that you will consider making a donation to SETI@home. You can make a secure donation by credit card by clicking this link. Instructions for donation by check or money order are there as well. Unless you specify otherwise, your donation will be noted by a star icon next to your username on the SETI@home pages and your username will appear on our list of donors. If you do not wish to have this recognition you may indicate that as well. Please be assured that regardless of whether or not you choose to have your donation be anonymous, SETI@home will not share your address with other organizations.
You can check on our fundraising progress by visiting our main site at http://setiathome.berkeley.edu
Thank You,
Sir Arthur C. Clarke
Author and Futurist and Dan Werthimer
Chief Scientist, SETI@hom
But mine had different numbers...
I'm considering any future support in light of the tone and implications of letter.
In other words, I found it ham-handed, and it doesn't speak well of UC Berkeley if they have such little respect for
the project. Not only that, but S@H advanced the practical research in distributed computing on a very large scale.
OTOH, maybe the funding dry-up is spurred by other BOINC projects that are jealous of the cpu cycles donated to
SETI@Home.
As I said, I'm evaluating.
The best arguemnt *FOR* intelligent life outside of Earth is that it *HASN'T* tried to contact us yet:-)
I am sure you had bigger results...I remember starting that project with a Intel 486 I believe...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.