Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eeevil conservative

But I thought that was why President Bush was angry with Congress in his speech this morning. Because the Senate wouldn't pass it without "sunset clauses". Didn't Frist vote it down so he could bring it up for legislative vote again without the clauses, and didn't Frist say that they wouldn't pass it with them (the sunset clauses) in it, and the President wouldn't sign it? Am I confused or missing part of the picture here?


154 posted on 12/17/2005 10:07:51 AM PST by ForTruthandJustice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: ForTruthandJustice

no- I may be the one missing that part....

I don't recall it being considered to be a permanent thing.

If it is, then I have to still submit to everyone that it is NOT a blanket spy act. It merely allows us to folow leads that bring us INTO the US. It is not used to TARGET US citizens.

My computer is down, I have no ears....I am using my son's computer with no speakers or sound...(YARG!)that is why I ask this next question...

hasn't Rush covered this????

I would think Rush would be all over this and explaining all this.....


170 posted on 12/17/2005 10:14:23 AM PST by eeevil conservative (courage is living in tyranny and speaking for freedom/not living in freedom and speaking for tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson