Skip to comments.
ACLU Shocked at Bush Use of National Security Agency for Domestic Spying...
ACLU ^
| 12/15/2005
Posted on 12/16/2005 6:31:55 PM PST by Jay777
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
1
posted on
12/16/2005 6:31:56 PM PST
by
Jay777
To: RepCath; Liz; IronJack; Grampa Dave; MeekOneGOP; Iris7; wkdaysoff; EdReform; Nick Danger; ...
PING!
2
posted on
12/16/2005 6:33:33 PM PST
by
Jay777
(My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.com)
To: Jay777
There is no special counsel law.
3
posted on
12/16/2005 6:34:16 PM PST
by
Perdogg
("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
To: All
4
posted on
12/16/2005 6:34:33 PM PST
by
Jay777
(My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.com)
To: Jay777
let's see if the administration has learned anything from the Fitzgerald fiasco - or if they just go into the usual "defense" mode on this nonsense.
5
posted on
12/16/2005 6:35:32 PM PST
by
oceanview
To: Perdogg
that doesn't mean DOJ can't appoint an independent counsel.
6
posted on
12/16/2005 6:36:14 PM PST
by
oceanview
To: Jay777
Can the New York Times be prosecuted for sedition?...
(they're leaking classified info during wartime)
It's very bad, when the nation's "most influential" newspaper, is actively giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
To: Jay777
How 'bout a special porsecuter to look into ACLU subversive and Un-American activities?
8
posted on
12/16/2005 6:37:37 PM PST
by
demlosers
To: Jay777
The ACLU is an anti-American subversive pro-crime organization that hates religion.
9
posted on
12/16/2005 6:38:01 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: oceanview
That's true. It would be unprecedented that the DoJ would appoint a special prosecutor to review a finding that the DoJ issued. It would set a very bad precedent.
10
posted on
12/16/2005 6:38:26 PM PST
by
Perdogg
("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I understand your sentiment regarding the New York Times however you must concede that the Bush Administration has done absolutely NOTHING to stop the continueous weekly (sometimes daily) leaks coming out of the CIA and the Pentagon since before the Iraqi War. I think Bush should pay attention to the leakers within the government and respond to their illegal acts appropriately rather than shut down the free press. Furthermore, the Bush admisnistration's PR Department is becoming a nightmare, if you ask me. The White House spokeperson is a clown and should have stepped down long ago.
The New York Times lost its credibility with the American People long ago. But leakers in government... they are the real law breakers.
http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html
11
posted on
12/16/2005 6:40:40 PM PST
by
MaineVoter2002
(http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
To: Jay777
I knew the Dims would be all over this....like flies on....oh well, you know!
12
posted on
12/16/2005 6:41:15 PM PST
by
TheLion
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Jay777
Once again, the ACLU loves to twist things.. the key to the original allegation is that they were tapping international calls and e-mails. All the NSA had to do was go through monitoring stations outside the US (eg on communication traffic hubs and tsos throughout the world)and its perfectly legal.
GOOD JOB NSA!
Buh-Bye ACLU
14
posted on
12/16/2005 6:44:59 PM PST
by
mnehring
(“Anybody who doesn’t appreciate what America has done and President Bush, let them go to hell”...)
To: demlosers
15
posted on
12/16/2005 6:45:22 PM PST
by
Jay777
(My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.com)
To: Jay777
ACLU = Alqueda Civil Liberties Union
16
posted on
12/16/2005 6:47:19 PM PST
by
stratman1969
(CLINTON LIED - 3,000+ DIED)
To: Jay777
The American Civil Liberties Union today expressed shock about revelations reported in the New York Times... So the ACLU expressed "shock" relating to a story in the New York Times? I do that everyday.
17
posted on
12/16/2005 6:48:34 PM PST
by
HoosierHawk
(Federal law prohibits the removal of this...)
To: Jay777
I'm all for it. At least Bush didn't throw Japanese-Americans into concentration camps, like Roosevelt, or throw political opponents in jail, like Lincoln.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I hate bringing up what many consider ancient history, but back when Slick Willie was being impeached we all joined together in a massive chorus of "We're a Nation of Laws," and "No President is Above the Law."
What happened? Sure, we got attacked by a bunch of terrorists but do we have to help them now? As I was led to believe, the objective of 'Atta and Co.' was to destroy our way of life. With the Patriot Act, the FEMA fiasco and a continual assault on the American Way by the media it doesn't seem like all that good an idea to allow a President--- ANY President to break the laws so many have died to uphold. While some might compare such actions to some sort of 'slippery slope,' it seems to me to be more like jumping into a black hole.
If he has broken the law, he needs to answer for it, just like you or I would.
19
posted on
12/16/2005 6:50:19 PM PST
by
oldfart
("All governments and all civilizations fall... eventually. Our government is not immune.)
To: Jay777
They are shocked ... shocked I tell you.
20
posted on
12/16/2005 6:50:55 PM PST
by
Hack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson