Posted on 12/16/2005 2:34:00 PM PST by anonymoussierra
WASHINGTON - The Senate on Friday refused to reauthorize major portions of the USA Patriot Act after critics complained they infringed too much on Americans' privacy and liberty, dealing a huge defeat to the Bush administration and Republican leaders.
In a crucial vote early Friday, the bill's Senate supporters were not able to get the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster by Sens. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., and Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and their allies. The final vote was 52-47.
{end of}
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Republicans congressional leaders had lobbied fiercely to make most of the expiring Patriot Act provisions permanent.
They also supported new safeguards and expiration dates to the act's two most controversial parts: authorization for roving wiretaps, which allow investigators to monitor multiple devices to keep a target from evading detection by switching phones or computers; and secret warrants for books, records and other items from businesses, hospitals and organizations such as libraries.
Feingold, Craig and other critics said those efforts weren't enough, and have called for the law to be extended in its present form so they can continue to try and add more civil liberties safeguards. But Bush, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and House Speaker Dennis Hastert have said they won't accept a short-term extension of the law.
If a compromise is not reached, the 16 Patriot Act provisions expire on Dec. 31, but the expirations have enormous exceptions. Investigators will still be able to use those powers to complete any investigation that began before the expiration date and to initiate new investigations of any alleged crime that began before Dec. 31, according to a provision in the original law. There are ongoing investigations of every known terrorist group, including al-Qaida, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Islamic Jihad and the Zarqawi group in Iraq, and all the Patriot Act tools could continue to be used in those investigations.
Five Republicans voted against the reauthorization: Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, John Sununu of New Hampshire, Craig and Frist. Two Democrats voted to extend the provisions: Sens. Tim Johnson of South Dakota and Ben Nelson of Nebraska.
Frist, R-Tenn., changed his vote at the last moment after seeing the critics would win. He decided to vote with the prevailing side so he could call for a new vote at any time. He immediately objected to an offer of a short term extension from Democrats, saying the House won't approve it and the president won't sign it.
"We have more to fear from terrorism than we do from this Patriot Act," Frist warned.
{end of}
If the Patriot Act provisions expire, Republicans say they will place the blame on Democrats in next year's midterm elections. "In the war on terror, we cannot afford to be without these vital tools for a single moment," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said. "The time for Democrats to stop standing in the way has come."
But the Patriot Act's critics got a boost from a New York Times report saying Bush authorized the National Security Agency to monitor the international phone calls and international e-mails of hundreds — perhaps thousands — of people inside the United States. Previously, the NSA typically limited its domestic surveillance to foreign embassies and missions and obtained court orders for such investigations.
"I don't want to hear again from the attorney general or anyone on this floor that this government has shown it can be trusted to use the power we give it with restraint and care," said Feingold, the only senator to vote against the Patriot Act in 2001.
"It is time to have some checks and balances in this country," shouted Sen. Patrick Leahy (news, bio, voting record), ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. "We are more American for doing that."
Most of the Patriot Act — which expanded the government's surveillance and prosecutorial powers against suspected terrorists, their associates and financiers — was made permanent when Congress overwhelmingly passed it after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington. Making the rest of it permanent was a priority for both the Bush administration and Republican leaders on Capitol Hill before Congress adjourns for the year.
The House on Wednesday passed a House-Senate compromise bill to renew the expiring portions of the Patriot Act that supporters say added significant safeguards to the law. Its Senate supporters say that compromise is the only thing that has a chance to pass Congress before 2006.
{end of}
"This is a defining moment. There are no more compromises to be made, no more extensions of time. The bill is what it is," said Sen. Jon Kyl (news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz.
The bill's opponents say the original act was rushed into law, and Congress should take more time now to make sure the rights of innocent Americans are safeguarded before making the expiring provisions permanent.
"Those that would give up essential liberties in pursuit in a little temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security," said Sen. John Sununu (news, bio, voting record), R-N.H. They suggested a short extension so negotiations could continue, but the Senate scrapped a Democratic-led effort to renew the USA Patriot Act for just three months before the vote began.
"Today, fair-minded senators stood firm in their commitment to the Constitution and rejected the White House's call to pass a faulty law," said Caroline Fredrickson, the director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Washington legislative office. "This was a victory for the privacy and liberty of all Americans."
I strongly intero believe your nation is in danger eto a te need to protect yourself.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“Infore this is your territory. I am reading and infore I believe your nation government should infore protect your state of life. I can’t really understand fully document written by your nation advisers; infore eto, I will ask you for helping me to understand this.
I strongly intero believe your nation is in danger eto a te need to protect yourself.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Thank you all information ping
You mean the republicans are letting everything be subject to a 60 vote rule now, when they barely have a majority??? Insanity and undemocratic.
Thank you "williams"
”Stand up for your nation”
It's pretty clear that it will take a mushroom cloud over some liberal bastion like NY or LA to get their attention. Justice would spare NY and LA in favor of DC.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“Your nation infore is intero democratic republic, you have power as people.”
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Thank you "vetsvette"
Better that it should be over Russ Feingold's house; NY is too close to me and mine.
FOOLS
Wonder how big the party is going to be in Terhan after they hear this?
I'm thinking Atlanta, there is no preparedness for
something like that around here.
Every time I come over Six Flags Hill where I can see downtown spread out before me, I have this vision of
a ball of sunlight at ground level, that grows and grows...
At the risk of sounding completely stupid, could someone succinctly and simply explain the whole process that is called "filibuster."
And how it has defeated the Patriot Act? The specifics as to maneuverings.
American Civil Liberties Union calling this "a victory" proves it's a defeat for the United States.
The Democrats and their pals again prove they intend harms for our safety and security.
It's like an early Christmas present!
Link to Vote:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00358
Rush Limbaugh was so mad today he repeated
what he said 2 months ago:
It's going to take another, possibly even
two more, 9/11 events before the idiots in
Congress see the writing on the wall. They
still want to "negotiate with the enemy" and
use "diplomatic measures" to solve the terrorist
problem. [I paraphrase]
I say send Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy and Reed
over to negotiate! Let them put their mouths
where there intentions are. Those tails would
be shoved so far up under their rears that they
would be squat-walking!
It's pretty clear it will take the election of Hillary Clinton to get freepers and some other conservatives to remember that too much power in federal hands is dangerous. That belief is what defined conservatism -- until recently.
Could you please tell me what language you are using?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.