Skip to comments.
Australia: Fury over radio host's racism
thecouriermail ^
| 12/17/05
| AAP
Posted on 12/16/2005 2:07:18 PM PST by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
12/16/2005 2:07:19 PM PST
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
All I see are raghead names protesting the 'outrage'. Why is everyone so craven before these b-stards?
To: robowombat
And the analysis by the radio host is perfectly true....in fact, the desire for muslims to marry 3-4 wives forces them to marry within the family.
3
posted on
12/16/2005 2:11:20 PM PST
by
indcons
To: Pikamax
Lost in all the shouts of "Racism" is a question - Does his statement have any factual basis or is it gratuitous?
4
posted on
12/16/2005 2:12:30 PM PST
by
TCats
To: Pikamax
many Lebanese "have parents who are first cousins whose parents were first cousins. I believe this to be indisputably accurate. It is very common in Arab cultures as a way of keeping the family's money "in the family."
The result of this is inbreeding the result of which is uneducationable (sic) people . . . and very low IQ".
Debatable at best. I don't know of any study that shows such an effect in Arab cultures, or elsewhere for that matter.
5
posted on
12/16/2005 2:13:08 PM PST
by
Restorer
(Islamists want to die. We want to kill them.)
To: Pikamax
"The media are the arm of the community," Sheik Khan said. "The government, the media, the community and police, they are working together like a car."
Sheik Khan's idea of a well-working car
To: Pikamax
"It reveals an uneducated comment on his part they are disgraceful comments
Is that illegal in Australia? If so, most Democratic leaders in this country would break that law.
7
posted on
12/16/2005 2:13:49 PM PST
by
msnimje
(Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
To: Pikamax
a Sydney Uniting Church, where a hall was burned to the ground on Wednesday night
Nice of them to mention this. If a mosque had been burned, it would lead the world news.
8
posted on
12/16/2005 2:15:36 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Pikamax
Inbreeding doesn't cause problems. Take a look at the British royal family....oh...never mind.
9
posted on
12/16/2005 2:15:48 PM PST
by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: Restorer
There has been a few stories the last couple of months in Norwegian and British media about inbreeding in Pakistani families causing birth defects and complications...
No mention of IQ though...
10
posted on
12/16/2005 2:15:49 PM PST
by
Eurotwit
(WI)
To: TCats
Does his statement have any factual basis or is it gratuitous?I don't know about Lebanese in Australia, but a recent article about Pakistanis in Britain said a huge percentage (up to 75%?) were in first-cousin marriages, many having parents, grandparents, ad infinitum, who were also.
Whether this produces "ineducable" low-IQ's as a general thing, I also don't know, but the article said the Pakistanis had an absolute majority of birth defects and genetic diseases diagnosed in Britain.
11
posted on
12/16/2005 2:17:36 PM PST
by
Tax-chick
("Dick Cheney never trims his own nails. He simply stares at them until the tips melt off.")
To: Pikamax
What's with this "racism" nonsense? Since when are the Lebanese members of a race that is different from that of the Aussies of European blood?
12
posted on
12/16/2005 2:19:06 PM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Do not trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Pikamax
The Aussies are going PC big time, and stepping in the nasty brown stuff at the same time.
There are published papers on the Saudi family and the larger than normal number of genetically related diseases which the investigator thought were a result of the inbreeding practiced by the Saudi's.
Sorry, Liberals - but reality simply is. One doesn't vote on science hypothesis, one verifies them. And inbreeding does shallow the gene pool.
Live with it, Liberals.
13
posted on
12/16/2005 2:20:04 PM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
To: Zuben Elgenubi
Sheik Khan's idea of a well-working car
**
LOL
14
posted on
12/16/2005 2:20:07 PM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Do not trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Pikamax
I work with a woman whose family is from Palestine and she said that marrying first cousins is their culture, so the guy was telling the truth.
To: Zuben Elgenubi
"The government, the media, the community and police, they are working together like a car."
Explains the fixation on burning them, amongst Muslim yoots, then, doesn't it?
To: robowombat
"Why is everyone so craven before these b-stards?"
Because the're scared sh#tless of being bombed. Or, worse, of being labeled 'racist.'
17
posted on
12/16/2005 2:22:42 PM PST
by
Levante
To: Pikamax
There's something deeply wrong with these awful people. Perhaps inbreeding explains some of it.
18
posted on
12/16/2005 2:26:04 PM PST
by
tkathy
(Ban the headscarf. (All religious headdress). The effect will creat a huge domino effect..)
To: Pikamax
Studies by Monash University's Bob Birrell of the most revealing test of immigrant integration, the marriage rate, showed that by the end of the '90s less than 10 per cent of second-generation marriages of people of European descent were to someone from their parents' country. Much the same was true of immigrants from south and east Asia. Only 6 per cent of Indians married within their ethnic group, as did only 18 per cent of Chinese. In short, most immigrants, whatever their race, married Australians of other nationalities. However, for the Lebanese, of whom most of marriageable age were Muslims, these figures were reversed. No less than 74 per cent of Lebanese brides and 61 per cent of Lebanese grooms married within their own ethnic group. Moreover, these figures had increased since the early '90s, when they were about six percentage points lower.
19
posted on
12/16/2005 2:30:24 PM PST
by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
To: robowombat
Why is everyone so craven before these b-stards?You don't recognize this?
This is the fruition of the "don't let the good be enemy to the best" mentality.
The logical conclusion always winds up being the status quo is the "good," because the "best" would cause social unrest.
Remember that next time someone tries to tell you you're throwing away your "chance" by sticking to principles.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson