Posted on 12/16/2005 9:39:00 AM PST by Past Your Eyes
Boston — The words emanating from Gov. Mitt Romney’s mouth on Wednesday conveyed he was not running for re-election next year. Yet the theatrics at his State House news conference portrayed him as a presidential contender.
From the dual banks of lights erected at stage right and stage left, to the new $2,500 podium shaped like the one President Bush often uses in the Rose Garden, Romney’s staff left no detail to chance as he ended one phase of his politicalcareer — and potentially opened another
(Excerpt) Read more at theunionleader.com ...
Pretty Boy.
Mormon problem:
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=9157
Mitt Romney. A RINO's RINO.
Yes, the "Mormon problem". Another example of Christian tolerance??
Massachusetts lost jobs and population during his reign.
At least he stodd up against Gay marriage.
Oh, yeah, he caved on that too.
Was Christ tolerant of the money changers in the temple? Nope...
- plewis1250
When he ran for governor of Mass, his religion was mentioned,but just basically left alone. It really didn't seem to be a talking point.
Dan
There is a problem when addendums are added to the Bible and the addendum is touted as the last and final word.
Matt 5:18 "For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled."
I don't have as much of a problem with that as I do with his wishywashy mealymouthedness on abortion. If he can get elected in Massive2sh!tts, that should tell you something.
But he's not going to get the nomination anyway so I'm not going to lose much sleep over it.
I think that if he were a solid conservative who was Mormon, he would have more support. The problem is that he appears wishy-washy on abortion and he is from Mass. His religion doesn't hurt, but it probably doesn't help either- Mormons are pretty concentrated in states that are already solidly red (except CA), but do not really play into the primaries.
I think we're supposed to believe he didn't really mean all that stuff the social conservatives hate. He just said it or did it because Ted Kennedy would have beat him up if he had told people what he really thought.
His Mormonism will not be a problem.
He is on the "right" side of every social issue so unless a better candidate emerges he will be fully embraced by the "christian" right. The Falwells, Dobsons, and D. James Kennedy's of the world will fully support him and the abberant teachings of the latter day saints will be further minimized until Mormon becomes just another "christian" denomination.
These so called "christian" leaders have already shown their willingness to compromise on doctrine when it seems to benefit their political ambitions. This will be just another step along the road to the one world, "can't we all just get along" religion
Surely you know that what you're talking about is just a "companion" to the Bible and not contradictory in any way?
/s
mormons are wishy-washy:
There is seldom any excuse for abortion. "The only exceptions are when--
Pregnancy has resulted from incest or rape;
The life or health of the woman is in jeopardy in the opinion of competent medical authority; or
The fetus is known, by competent medical authority, to have severe defects that will not allow the baby to survive beyond birth.
http://www.lds.org/library/display/0,4945,11-1-13-49,00.html
AFAIK the only rock solid principle he ever stood by was that he would not have Rappaport as his Lt. Gov.
Massachusetts isn't known for making decisions based upon ones moral values.
But in the South, his religion will be a factor. In polls taken since Romney's father's Presidential run, the percentage of voters who will NOT vote for a Mormon have remained consistent at 17%.
It's really too bad that there are those who would oppose a good, conservative candidate because of their inexplicable fear of Mormons. What is it, exactly, that the "No Votes for Mormons" gang is afraid of? Do they think a Mormon president would order the slaughter of their firstborn or something?
Really, I want to know. What supposedly horrible atrocities would be wrought by a Mormon president? Nobody seems to have such an automatic aversion to other major religions, despite basic doctrinal differences between most of them, so this baffles me.
Mormon politicians have, for the most part, been honest, solid conservatives. Why wouldn't you want a Mormon president?
Yeah right.
Joseph Smith said, "I told the brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book."
http://scriptures.lds.org/bm/intrdctn
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.