Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Owl_Eagle

What's missing is any indication of whether or not these additional surveillance efforts were extremely urgent (such that the time getting a warrant was an undue risk) or not. If its the latter, it seems to me like these sorts of operations would clearly be unconstitutional. THAT would be a HUGE problem for the prez...


27 posted on 12/16/2005 7:33:32 AM PST by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eraser2005
It is not necessary for the government to prove the surveillance was necessary. It is implied by the fact they were carried out that they where. This article contains not one fact to show anything was done improperly. It is nothing but allegations backed by opinions from un named sources.
30 posted on 12/16/2005 7:38:33 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: eraser2005
If its the latter, it seems to me like these sorts of operations would clearly be unconstitutional. THAT would be a HUGE problem for the prez...

Oh, you can assume that if the losers are writing the story, it will always be the latter.

Of course, if the president runs over a pack of girl scouts in his SUV, THAT would be a HUGE problem for the president too.

But the accusation and the source of such a charge should never be the conclusive determinant. Specially not in the last 5 years!

84 posted on 12/16/2005 11:53:36 AM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson