Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Southwest pilot violated braking policy
Chicago Sun Times ^ | 12-15-06 | MARK J. KONKOL

Posted on 12/15/2005 1:06:39 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser

Southwest pilot violated braking policy

December 14, 2005

BY MARK J. KONKOL Transportation Reporter

The Southwest Airlines pilot at the helm during Thursday's snowy crash at Midway Airport told federal investigators he used the Boeing 737's "autobrakes," a device airline officials say their pilots are told not to activate.

National Transportation Safety Board investigators said they found the autobrake switch in the "maximum" position on the flight panel. The system is designed to activate when the landing gear hits the runway.

(Excerpt) Read more at suntimes.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: airlines; brakingnews; flight1248; mdw; southwest; swa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
aviation ping
1 posted on 12/15/2005 1:06:39 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

'Braking news?'


2 posted on 12/15/2005 1:08:00 PM PST by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

"autobrakes" on an airliner. No wonder it failed to stop...


3 posted on 12/15/2005 1:09:13 PM PST by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

Autobrakes at Midway, in snow? Sheese!!


4 posted on 12/15/2005 1:11:47 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

The way the article reads, it sounds like the crew decided to depend on the autobrake system without using the reverse thrusters at all.

I can't imagine that, especially with snow on the ground.


5 posted on 12/15/2005 1:13:44 PM PST by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

The article is kind of unclear and confusing.

I'm checking on airline boards for the reaction.

But, MDW is a terrible airport, and Southwest has some policies that may have led to this accident.


6 posted on 12/15/2005 1:15:53 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Screw Christmas, Happy Festivus!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser; Pukin Dog

Pinging the only pilot I know. What's your opinion on this?


7 posted on 12/15/2005 1:16:26 PM PST by BreitbartSentMe (Ex-Democrat since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

Wonder why this is being leaked before the investigation is completed?


8 posted on 12/15/2005 1:16:57 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

I'm thinking the autobrake is nothing more than an automatic system for engaging the reverse thrusters. It also sounds like this system is not used and that the pilot used it, and because of that can be blamed for the accident.

I'm a little torn on this one. Definitely his fault for not doing things the way everybody says it should be done, and which we know works. But how liable can someone be for using a system that was clearly labeled and installed, even if its use is against policy...???


9 posted on 12/15/2005 1:18:29 PM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser; Dashing Dasher

What are we talking about here??


10 posted on 12/15/2005 1:18:40 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

That's interesting. The airline I fly for teaches that autobrakes in maximum are more efficient than human braking and in these circumstances if it were me in this guys shoes I would be cited for not using autobrakes!

Of course, the equipment I fly is different so maybe the 737 autobrakes are not very effective.


11 posted on 12/15/2005 1:19:05 PM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

The only thing I can figure is that the autobrake system was somehow set, and because of that the reverse thrusters wouldn't engage. In the meantime, the pilots -- not having the time to figure it out -- figured they would stomp on the brakes.

This also seems unlikely, though. It's baffling.


12 posted on 12/15/2005 1:20:40 PM PST by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
The SW policy against the auto brakes seems to be that application of such on touch down (greater than 80 knots) may cause brake fade as perhaps it did.
13 posted on 12/15/2005 1:21:25 PM PST by Deguello (If you want to hear God laugh, tell him your plans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

I think the autobrakes should be applied, but Southwest doesn't and I'm not sure if that is part of their training. My airline didn't have the -700's, not sure of the policy. Is that runway Cat II?


14 posted on 12/15/2005 1:22:23 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Screw Christmas, Happy Festivus!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

They should just close Midway and make a park out of it.


15 posted on 12/15/2005 1:22:36 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut

Ping


16 posted on 12/15/2005 1:22:52 PM PST by Dashing Dasher ((It was) Like being shot through a pinball machine with a piano on your chest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

Autobrakes are for wheel braking only and the reversers are a separate system. Reversers are far more effective at higher airspeed and especially in poor braking conditions. If the reversers weren't used the pilot gave up his most effective system for slowing the aircraft immediately after landing. The slower you get, the more effective the wheel brakes are.


17 posted on 12/15/2005 1:23:08 PM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Deguello

The article quotes a former SW pilot who said the policy had to do with on time performance. That is braking at speeds over eithty knots required a longer time period to allow for brake cooling.


18 posted on 12/15/2005 1:23:20 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush and the SAPPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
The AUTOBRAKES are set for activating the ANTI-SKID system of the wheel brakes (analogous to ABS on a car). Airline policy probably allows their use but not during icy runway conditions; the article was not clear on the distinction.

The TRs probably have to be selected manually on the throttle quadrant. The spoilers are the only other "AUTO" system I am aware of but that 73 maybe a more advanced model.

19 posted on 12/15/2005 1:23:51 PM PST by IFly4Him
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Don't give the Mayor any ideas. The way he closed Meigs was criminal.


20 posted on 12/15/2005 1:24:30 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Screw Christmas, Happy Festivus!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson