Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1.4 million immigration population in US from India
HT.com ^ | Washington, December 13, 2005 | HT.com

Posted on 12/14/2005 7:36:46 AM PST by CarrotAndStick

As the US Congress considers some tough immigration proposals to tighten the entry process into the country, a new study shows that of the 35.2 million foreign-born population in America in 2005, around 1.4 million are Indians.

There are 35.2 million foreign-born people with the number of illegal immigrants anywhere between 9 to 13 million, according to the study by the Centre for Immigration Studies.

"The 35.2 million immigrants living in the country in March 2005 is the highest number ever recorded -- two-and-a-half times the 13.5 million during the peak of the last great immigration wave in 1910," said by Steven Camarota, director of research for the Centre.

Of the 35.2 million foreign born immigrants in the United States in 2005, South Asia would account for 1.8 million with India taking the bulk of this figure with 1.411 millions and accounting for a citizenship rate of nearly 34 per cent.

About 12.1 per cent of the current US population was born in another country, the highest percentage since 1920, according to Census figures.

Overall Mexico will come away with the highest number of foreign immigrants at nearly 11 million which will be followed by East Asia, South Asia (India) and Vietnam in South East Asia.

Statistics show that as far as India is concerned, the period 2000 to 2005 showed a sharp upswing in the number of immigrants at nearly 460,000 for the 5-year period.

The pre-1980 statistics show an immigrant population number for India at 170,000, rising to 209,000 between 1980 and 1989 and to 573,000 between 1990 and 1999.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; asia; china; europe; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; india; indianamericans; mexico; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-146 next last
To: bordergal

Good question. Surely not everyone who went through Ellis Island was a model citizen, but at least requiring them to go through a process would weed out a portion of the bad eggs.


81 posted on 12/14/2005 8:50:47 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

I have no problem with their presence here if they are here legally, which most are. The problem lies in the fact that most are here to fill high tech jobs under H1B visas. Generally, they work for less than the usual wage of an American. Ostensibly, they fill jobs that for which there are no qualified Americans. Nothing could be further from the truth, but Congress turns a blind eye to the fact that greedy companies are using this, and "off-shoring" to give American jobs to cheap foreign labor here and abroad. This ships our technology overseas, as well as, valuable experience. Soon our youth will have only burger flipping jobs to aspire to. The H1B program continues to flourish because the greedy corporate sector wines and dines Congress, while the tech worker struggles.


82 posted on 12/14/2005 8:52:20 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Celebrate Clinton Impeachment Day - Dec 19th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Well stated, Friend


83 posted on 12/14/2005 8:58:34 AM PST by indcons (indcons on Rush Limbaugh's show (transcript): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1535861/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I think there should be a list of "high risk" countries (e.g. Saudi Arabia, for one) based on past immigration experiences in the US and other western countries based on assimilation rates/crime stats/social factors/welfare use/other qualities.

You could set up a computer program to evaluate risk. Immigrants from countries that have PROVEN to be good and productive citizens overall would have preference. Those from "high risk" countries would have to go through a much more intensive process, and would have much lower immigration rates overall.


84 posted on 12/14/2005 8:59:56 AM PST by bordergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: bordergal

There ws a thread on FR the other day about how the Feds have REMOVED Saudi Arabia and Pakistan from the list of high risk countries. They have also extended the Green Card lottery to Saudi nationals.

As a result of the changes in the student visa program, 10, 000 Saudi "students" are expected land here next year.


85 posted on 12/14/2005 9:03:07 AM PST by indcons (indcons on Rush Limbaugh's show (transcript): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1535861/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Oh, just freakin great.

How long are we going to keep up this charade that Saudi Arabia is our "friend"?


86 posted on 12/14/2005 9:06:49 AM PST by bordergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Are HI-B's counted as immigrants? I thought not.


87 posted on 12/14/2005 9:07:08 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; A CA Guy; ...

ping


88 posted on 12/14/2005 9:07:46 AM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

Protect our borders and coastlines from all foreign invaders!

Support our Minutemen Patriots!

Be Ever Vigilant ~ Bump!


89 posted on 12/14/2005 9:10:58 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: sheana

Sheana, my guess is that they were Paki.


90 posted on 12/14/2005 9:16:23 AM PST by CATravelAgent (Islam - THE anti-Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sheana
Do we have a shortage of offensive people?

ROFL

No, we have plenty, maybe we can make immigration of anyone contingent upon the egression (not positive I'm using that word correctly, it's the closest I could come to an antonym for immigration) of offensive people from here to somewhere else! :P

Oh, and I think I should get to decide who's offensive!

susie

91 posted on 12/14/2005 9:24:50 AM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
As long as an immigrant is legal- no matter where they are from, I welcome them with open arms

Even if they believe in "mother government" and do not support us or our culture?
92 posted on 12/14/2005 9:27:49 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

...and before long the US will be as crowded as India. I say shut down the INS for a 5 year moratorium on ALL immigration from EVERYWHERE.


93 posted on 12/14/2005 9:28:30 AM PST by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

Just saw that reptile on your home page. You certainly have nerves of steel. Bumping against an alligator with a kayak? OMG! What were you thinking?!


94 posted on 12/14/2005 9:30:13 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: bordergal
How long are we going to keep up this charade that Saudi Arabia is our "friend"?

Until we don't need their oil.

95 posted on 12/14/2005 9:42:18 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: One Proud Dad
The odor of their cultural food on the stove nauseates me.

When I have to get a motel room in what used to be a best western type motel, that odor of cultural food as I entered a motel office turned me away. Unfortunately, now almost all of those types of motels are owned/run by Indians.

96 posted on 12/14/2005 9:42:40 AM PST by shebacal (Go, Minutemen, Go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

Ping


97 posted on 12/14/2005 9:48:45 AM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity
In Silicon Valley in CA, they live 3-4-5 in small apts. and all they do is work. While some may commend their work ethic, I do not.

WTF??

98 posted on 12/14/2005 9:49:47 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CATravelAgent
Sheana, my guess is that they were Paki.

That was my thought. BTW, usually, there are city or county laws of some sort against parking commercial vehicles on one's front lawn.

Everyone from India I work with or have met are well educated and gentlemanly in their manner. Their food is delicious, if you like spice. I've heard them call in sport talk shows complaining about this player or that player. They assimilate. As an added bonus - they have no use for Moslems.

99 posted on 12/14/2005 9:51:32 AM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Are HI-B's counted as immigrants?

I don't count people here on work/student/tourist visas as immigrants, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the article didn't when it said "around 1.4 million [immigrants] are Indians".

There are a lot of reporters out there who constantly refer to illegal aliens as immigrants, so who knows.

100 posted on 12/14/2005 9:55:16 AM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson