Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Viewpoint: Many Muslims 'do' condemn terrorism
Middle East Times ^ | December 9, 2005 | Samar Dahmash Jarrah

Posted on 12/13/2005 12:42:48 PM PST by nickcarraway

FLORIDA -- It's true. Many Muslims do condemn terrorism - we just don't hear about it in the American news media.

Yet Americans continue to ask: "Why don't Muslims condemn terrorism? We keep waiting for the so-called moderates to speak out against violence and yet no one comes forward." A man in the audience asked me this question recently when I was invited to speak at a Unitarian Fellowship about what Arabs think about the US and Americans. I had just finished saying that many of the Arab people I interviewed for my book a year ago in Egypt, Jordan and Kuwait had condemned fanatics like Osama Bin Laden.

Perhaps the man wasn't listening. And honestly, what if many Muslims condemn terrorism day in and day out? Will this make terrorism go away? I speak to the public several times a month and at half these events the same question is repeated.

I asked the gentleman if he had heard about the Fiqh Council of North America that had recently issued a public fatwa (religious decree) against terrorism. I asked him if he had heard about other prominent Muslim scholars who have taken public stands against terrorism. As always happens with people who ask these questions, he did not know of my examples.

It seems strange that many Americans keep asking a question originating four years ago by a few conservative talking heads and so-called experts. Perhaps this question has been parroted by TV commentators and reporters so much that we have stopped thinking for ourselves. But I believe that we can still think and find the truth on our own. If we try, we might get more answers than questions.

Perhaps we should stop placing blind faith in American news media and look to other sources, perhaps even the Internet for alternative reporting and commentary.

So why does the question persist? The answer is simple. How often do you see Muslims interviewed on American TV? A few here and there. But how many times do you watch TV shows where non-Muslims and non-Arabs talk about Islam and Arabs as if they were experts? Most of the time.

If you really want to know why you're not hearing about Muslims publicly condemning terrorism - ask the US media this question. Ask them why the images of Bin Laden and Zarqawi are better known to the average American than the face and name of Hamza Youssef. Why do such fanatics get more airtime than Youssef and other moderate American Muslim scholars and thinkers?

Ask why two local newspapers in southwest Florida did not cover a three-lecture series on Islam given by a Muslim Palestinian American woman in a Jewish synagogue. Is it because the exchange was civil? Is it because we disagreed amicably? Should we have thrown stones at each other to make the event worthy of coverage?

A year ago I spoke to a group of humanists who complained that the media refused to cover the event. No wonder people still ask me why American Muslims do not participate in interfaith dialogue. We do participate, but we receive little or no news media coverage.

My recent talk was interesting in many ways. A man said, "I agree with only 80 percent of what you said." I replied. "Great! My husband agrees with only 20 percent of what I say."

I was asked if I thought that US troops in Iraq should be withdrawn. "Yes, they should," I replied. "I would especially think so if I were a mother or father of a soldier."

Another man said, "Islam makes people violent because it is like Christianity where followers believe that they must evangelize and convert people into their own faith to be saved. We never hear of Hindu terrorists."

I reminded him of the assassinations of Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi and her son Rajeev, and the horrors of Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini. None of them were Muslim. Would it be fair to condemn their faiths because of the actions of a few?

I asked the man where Judaism and Christianity would be today if Muslims were truly required by their faith to convert Jews and Christians. What were Muslims doing over the past 1,400 years? Not converting others to their faith.

The questions were pointed, thoughtful and challenging. "Did the US attack on the Iraqi city of Fallujah cause more terrorism?" "Are the recent bombings in Jordan related to the US Army presence in Iraq?" "What do you think of Ahmed Chalabi's visit to Washington?" "Is it true that Arabs teach hatred of Americans in schools?" One woman asked me what I thought of the statement made by the president of Iran about wiping Israel off the map. Another asked, "If there is an independent Palestinian state, will Gaza survive?"

So you see - there are vibrant, inquisitive American minds wanting to know more and understand better. Unfortunately, such dialogues are not sensational news, so they become missed opportunities. Next time you wonder why you don't hear of Muslims condemning terrorism - ask the American media.

Samar Dahmash Jarrah is an American Arab Muslim woman writer who lives in Florida, USA. She is the author of the book Arab Voices Speak to American Hearts, published in May 2005 by Olive Branch books


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dissimulation; moderateislam; muslim; taqiyya; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: nickcarraway
RAFSANJANI, RAFSANJANI, RAFSANJANI, Muslims are the only ones who can solve this problem.

Muslims who don't understand, maybe they will understand there will be no Iran and probably no Muslims.

21 posted on 12/13/2005 1:53:54 PM PST by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hey, maybe she doesn't want to convert us by violence, only
by coersion and overwhelming numbers. If there are moderate
muslimes, then why don't they get along with anyone anywhere? They don't even like other muslimes. I think I'm more likely to meet a unicorn that a moderate muslime.


22 posted on 12/13/2005 1:59:52 PM PST by jusduat (I am a strange and recurring anomaly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I asked the man where Judaism and Christianity would be today if Muslims were truly required by their faith to convert Jews and Christians. What were Muslims doing over the past 1,400 years? Not converting others to their faith.

Her desire for sincere interfath dialogue is probably well intentioned but it will work better when it is based on facts.

Muslim invaders had to be bodily ejected from parts of western and eastern Europe by peoples who did not want to be converted at the point of a sword or live as second class persons in their own countries.

It may be necessary to do it again.
23 posted on 12/13/2005 2:00:18 PM PST by Captain Rhino (If you will just abandon logic, these things will make a lot more sense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

and I'm tall dark and handsome and am hung like a big ol bull.
BULL


24 posted on 12/13/2005 2:52:27 PM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

Muslims condemning terrorism: "Al Taq(iyyah), very little action."


25 posted on 12/13/2005 3:27:44 PM PST by Squeako (ACLU: "Only Christians, Boy Scouts and War Memorials are too vile to defend.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

So why does the question persist? The answer is simple. How often do you see Muslims interviewed on American TV? A few here and there. But how many times do you watch TV shows where non-Muslims and non-Arabs talk about Islam and Arabs as if they were experts? Most of the time.

Contact Fox news and ask to go on Hannity and Combs.
Or Bill o'riely


26 posted on 12/13/2005 4:05:41 PM PST by LtKerst (Lt Kerst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squeako
Muslims condemning terrorism: "Al Taq(iyyah), very little action."

I have seen it spelled a few ways.

But it would surely cover "misdirection" eg. doing or saying anything to advance their expansion.

The west is too gullible, starting at the top.

27 posted on 12/13/2005 4:41:44 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
I have seen it spelled a few ways.

I was just using the part that sounds like "All talk, very little action." Whenever we hear them saying, "We denounce terrorism", we know not to just believe them. I just hope when the President says, "Islam is a religion of peace", he's just putting al taqiyyah to good use! Sadly, people in the West believe him when he says it!

28 posted on 12/14/2005 12:38:53 AM PST by Squeako (ACLU: "Only Christians, Boy Scouts and War Memorials are too vile to defend.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson