Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Dept. Rules Out Guarantee on Iran-(to not go to war with Iran)
ap ^ | 12.12.05 | BARRY SCHWEID

Posted on 12/13/2005 5:18:02 AM PST by Flavius

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is ruling out a guarantee not to attack Iran to induce it to halt development of nuclear weapons. ADVERTISEMENT Anderson Cooper

Iran must first act like a responsible member of the international community and stop violating its agreements, State Department spokesman Adam Ereli said Monday.

"That would represent a sea change in its behavior," Ereli said. "Then maybe other kinds of notions might be more palatable."

"But right now, I don't think people should be asking the United States, 'Why don't you do this or why don't you do that?'" the U.S. official said.

Ereli's remarks appeared to dismiss a suggestion by Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency, who said Monday in Stockholm that he believed the United States would need to give Iran a security guarantee before a final agreement could be reached on Iran's atomic programs.

ElBaradei also said the United States would need to become more involved in stalled negotiations between Iran and the European Union aimed at persuading Iran to permanent freeze nuclear enrichment.

Last week, Undersecretary of State Robert Joseph said that step was the last "red line" Iran needed to cross to produce nuclear weapons.

Negotiations, meanwhile, are stalled.

In parallel talks designed to halt North Korea's nuclear weapons programs, the United States has offered written guarantees it would not be attacked.

The assurances were offered by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and her predecessor, Colin Powell.

On Iran, President Bush, last February, said it was "simply ridiculous" to assume the United States had plans to attack and Rice has made similar statements.

Unlike the negotiations with Iran, the United States is a participant in the negotiations, along with South Korea, Japan, China and Russia.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: america2freeiran; americans4afreeiran; azadi; deadmullahsstink; georgefreeirannow; iran; iranazadi; usa4afreeiran; war

1 posted on 12/13/2005 5:18:03 AM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Always keep your options open.


2 posted on 12/13/2005 5:27:20 AM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

For what it's worth - as much as I detest her - if Hillary were to become President, it seems to me her recent posturing against leaving the region too quickly is an indication that she has probably already been advised that we're headed for an unavoidable confrontation with Iran, and likely at or near the time she would take office if - God forbid - she's actually elected.


3 posted on 12/13/2005 9:46:16 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson