Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman Murtha Responds to Bush's Speech
Sierra Times ^ | 12/13/2005 | Jim Kouri, CPP

Posted on 12/13/2005 5:13:25 AM PST by FerdieMurphy

Want to know how popular Representative John Murtha (D-PA) is these days? Well, guess who the news media run to like school kids whenever the big, bad President George Bush gives a speech? You guessed it: they scamper over to their hero, John Murtha.

And it's not like he's saying anything he hasn't said before. And it's not like the media isn't reporting anything about Murtha's statement they haven't reported before. It's merely an exercise the media undertakes to make certain an antiwar icon gets equal time, even if that antiwar icon is a Washington insider suspected of ethics violations.

However, following Bush's speech yesterday morning, Murtha did have some new rhetoric included with his usual diatribe about a sanctimonious surrender -- or, as the Democrats now call surrender, "strategic redeployment." And it's his latest statement that deserves further analysis.

During Murtha's latest tirade yesterday, he criticized the President for having such a small military. Murtha worried that in an unsafe world -- as a result of the North Koreans and Iranians, as well as terrorists, Syrians and other dangers -- the United States military is too tiny to respond to emergencies. We're bogged down in Iraq and we don't have a big enough military thanks to Bush. He even went as far as advocating a draft, as if conscription was so successful during the Vietnam War and on the American homefront.

Yes, Murtha suddenly realizes on December 12, 2005 that America's military is too small. And it's all George Bush's fault, too.

Well, not really.

Does Rep. Murtha recall President Bill Clinton's so-called Peace Dividend? I know the news media don't remember -- or perhaps they do remember but hope we've forgotten. Clinton's well-known dislike for the military led to his intentional neglect of his primary responsibility: the protection of the American people. During the Clinton Administration, in less than three years, deployments for humanitarian missions increased while manpower decreased from 2.1 million to 1.6 million.

The decrease in armed forces was called "reinvention" of government. While telling Americans that Clinton was making deep cuts in the federal bureaucracy, the media failed to inform Americans exactly what part of that "bureaucracy" was being cut. It was the military who suffered the cuts in order to make Clinton a hero.

Of the 305,000 employees removed from the federal payroll, 286,000 (or 90%) were military cuts. The statistics for America's defense during the Clinton years reveal the true feelings of the administration toward those who served in the military. The Army was cut from 18 divisions to 12. The Navy was reduced from 546 ships to 380. Air Force flight squadrons were cut from 76 to a mere 50. There were reductions in tanks, armored vehicles, rocket launchers, special forces units, etc., etc., etc.

In addition, President Clinton loosened America's ban on the export of supercomputers and other high-technology products to Communist China; this allowed Beijing to improve the accuracy of its intercontinental missiles. A prime American beneficiary of this Clinton policy was Loral Space & Communications chairman Bernard Schwartz, the single largest contributor to the Clinton campaign and to the Democrat Party.

In 1996 it was discovered that Chinese spies had stolen nuclear design secrets from the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the most damaging security breach in American history -- giving China the ability to produce and deliver nuclear warheads via submarines, mobile missiles, and long-range missiles. A 1998 Senate Governmental Affairs Committee concluded that foreign campaign contributions Clinton had received "were facilitated by individuals with extensive ties to China."

There's much more, but the point here is not to reexamine the Clinton military and national security record, but to question Congressman John Murtha's allegation about Bush's military.

While all of this stripping away of America's military establishment was being carried out by Clinton and his flunkies, where was Murtha? Did Murtha stand in front of the TV cameras and microphones and proclaim his utter disgust at what was happening to the US Armed Forces?

Did the news media go running to Murtha to get his opinion on Clinton selling US national security for campaign contributions? Did Murtha fear for the safety of Americans when the military budget allowed only the maintenance of military equipment and weapons systems? And where was Murtha when many career soldiers found themselves on the unemployment lines?

Did Murtha complain when Clinton used our meager forces to conduct his humanitarian expeditions? The truth is, Murtha said nothing. He went along with his party's leadership, the same way he's going along with them now. His audacity is colossal. He blames George Bush, who's actually improved the military, for what Bill Clinton did during his scandal infested administration. But don't hold your breath for the mainstream news media to ask the right questions when they interview John Murtha.

And so, apparently, in December of 2005, Representative John Murtha discovered that America's military is too small. Now that's some kind of epiphany.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: murtha; senilecongressrat; surrendermonkey
...an exercise the media undertakes to make certain an antiwar icon gets equal time, even if that antiwar icon is a Washington insider suspected of ethics violations.

Ethics violations committed by a socialist old walrus suffering from dementia, no doubt.

Icon?

Hardly.

1 posted on 12/13/2005 5:13:27 AM PST by FerdieMurphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
Murtha's Legacy. 30 years of Washington Insider Corruption capped off with Treason.
2 posted on 12/13/2005 5:29:30 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Now the Democrat leadership claims that accurately quoting them is "attack politics")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Just when you thought the MSM couldn't find anyone crazier than Cindy.


3 posted on 12/13/2005 5:31:35 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Murtha's Legacy. 30 years of Washington Insider Corruption capped off with Treason.

But ... But ... but, he's a former Marine and war hero!!! (Per the liberal lamestream media)

4 posted on 12/13/2005 5:34:06 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Murtha's Legacy. 30 years of Washington Insider Corruption capped off with Treason.

But ... But ... but, he's a former Marine and war hero!!! (Per the liberal lamestream media)

Benedict Arnold was a war hero at first too.

5 posted on 12/13/2005 5:37:37 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Now the Democrat leadership claims that accurately quoting them is "attack politics")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Murtha wants Pork.

THAT is what he wants to hear. When the troops return Murtha gets a pork dividend.


6 posted on 12/13/2005 5:37:41 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

Murtha was a week end warrior-- a reserve. I can't speak for other services but USN reserves in my 26 years of expierence were mostly a waste of tax payers money. Their interest for their summer cruise was I&I-intercourse and intoxication. The two weeks of active duty every summer gave them retirement points and time away from the wife and kids plus extra cash each month and added paid vacation time away from work. IN 26 active years I saw exactly two reservist worth a tinkers dam. The military goes into a near sate of panic every time a political type drives by the base and when one is a reserve on active duty the entire base lines up to kiss his royal butt. I loved my USN but not the USNR.


7 posted on 12/13/2005 5:58:41 AM PST by BTCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

8 posted on 12/13/2005 5:58:59 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Murtha spouts the airhead politics of that loony Howard
Dean. Anyone who has to be embraced by Nancy Pelosi is hard up for love.


9 posted on 12/13/2005 6:05:35 AM PST by hgro (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

The useless and increasingly brainless old pig Murtha should go home and stop embarassing his constituents and himself.


10 posted on 12/13/2005 6:23:07 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BTCM

From what I remember about 50% of the guys serving in world war II were reservists, and they died just as dead as the regulars.

I watched, while a Destroyer Escort was berthed inn Whitestone, New York because I was offered a promotion if I joined the crew.
I chose to stay in the Security group and about 1 year later after getting a complete crew , Kennedy sent the D.E. over to asia to fight in the Korean war.
They evidently did their jobs.


11 posted on 12/13/2005 6:27:34 AM PST by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Fat, white-haired, old, dem/lib/socialist bloviator in the House -- Murtha
Fat, white-haired, old, dem/lib/socialist bloviator in the Senate -- Kennedy
Clones or separated at birth?


12 posted on 12/13/2005 6:46:56 AM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
Murtha lied! Murtha said that 80% of Iraqis want us out but a recent ABC poll indicated that 52% Iraqis want us to stay till it's safe.
13 posted on 12/13/2005 7:18:03 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: tobyhill
Murtha has started hedging on that 80% figure.

Now he's saying "polls show between 60 and 80% want us out".

In a few days he'll probably drop that line altogether.

I get the impression the dems are letting him wing it. Otherwise someone would be updating his speeches.

15 posted on 12/13/2005 9:26:40 AM PST by smoothsailing (NamVet'68'69----NEVER FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
I listened to him yesterday and pretty much everything out of his mouth was either incoherent or the cut and run strategy. I'm sure the Rats will now tell him to shut up but I hope I'm wrong.
16 posted on 12/13/2005 9:46:41 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

He, like tottering old creeps like Byrd-brain, holds our nation up to ridicule and has no shame for his disgusting comments.


17 posted on 12/13/2005 11:08:20 AM PST by FerdieMurphy (For English press one. Only in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson