Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mysterious Kingfisher-area gas geysers leave officials puzzled
EnidNews.com ^ | 13DEC2005 | Cass Rains

Posted on 12/13/2005 5:10:43 AM PST by QwertyKPH

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: NearlyNormal
Maybe you should read the story:

Click Here:



21 posted on 12/13/2005 10:07:56 AM PST by QwertyKPH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: QwertyKPH

Oh that's just great QKPH, there goes my appetite!


22 posted on 12/13/2005 2:08:21 PM PST by NearlyNormal (Our military can always win a war, only the liberals and their MSM loose them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: QwertyKPH

Isn't there a rather large fault line somewhere in the central part of the country? I thought I heard about one either in Kansas or Missouri.


23 posted on 12/13/2005 2:16:10 PM PST by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QwertyKPH

Kingfisher is smack dab in the middle of a "known" oil&gas field -- the Sooner Trend.


24 posted on 12/13/2005 9:06:06 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Deguello

No salt domes in Oklahoma. They're all along the Gulf Coast -- TX, Louisiana, MS, AL. The salt in the mid-continent is called "bedded salt" and exists in stratas interspersed with other minerals--not used for storage.


25 posted on 12/13/2005 9:08:30 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT

That's the New Madrid--see post #18. Not anywhere near Kingfisher, OK. Does have constant low-level seismic activity, though. Look on the earthquake-watcher webpages some time. Always something shakin' in the New Madrid seismic zone.


26 posted on 12/13/2005 9:12:18 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FlatLandBeer

The article said the USGS said the area has been dead for seismic activity for some time, which surprised me. The largest "felt" earthquake in OK was in El Reno, due south of Kingfisher, many years ago, but the last measurable small rumblings were just in May 2005.

If you go to the OGS (Oklahoma Geological Survey) website, there's a slide show-type program showing mapped locations in OK of all the more noticeable seismic occurrences since 1977 thru last year, I believe. A majority of them have occurred in the area of El Reno, with one major in Kingfisher in mid 1980s--I think it was either 1984 or 1987.

Anything I could think of (my theory was a nearby new well being drilled perhaps loosening some underground formation with a gas trap adjacent--but now we know it's following a surface formation--the creekbed--so that's out) -- wouldn't touch all the things that the consulted experts must have ruled out already.

It's a real mystery! (And I don't remember your FST reference, just "Don't Crush that Dwarf, Give Me the Pliers" and "Antelope Freeway, 1 mile ... Antelope Freeway, 1/2 mile ... Antelope Freeway, 1/4th mile ... Antelope Freeway, 1/8th mile ...".)


27 posted on 12/13/2005 9:28:19 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Anybody have any updated news from there? Any developments?


28 posted on 12/14/2005 5:56:14 AM PST by crghill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: crghill

Tue December 13, 2005
Geysers near Kingfisher spew gas, spur confusion

By Tony Thornton
The Oklahoman

http://newsok.com/article/1703436/
“Charles Mankin, director of the Oklahoma Geological Survey at the University of Oklahoma, said: "It's happened before and it'll happen again."

He said the most likely cause is a drill that let natural gas to escape into permeable underground layers.

"It's man-induced," he said. "There is no geologic activity out there that would cause that."

Their quandary: Why did miniature geysers suddenly emerge along a 10-mile stretch of Winter Camp Creek?

Their mission: To make them subside, or at least to control them before they become a health hazard.

Three days after a hunter first spotted water and mud bursting up southwest of Kingfisher, the mystery remained...”

[Inset Article]What's happening in Kingfisher?
Nobody is sure why geysers have sprung up in the area, but experts offered some explanations.

Blaming Mother Nature
Jim Puckette, a professor of geology at Oklahoma State University, said such natural fractures within rock are not unheard of in western Oklahoma. He said he has not seen the geysers or talked to anyone about them.

"You get a gas bubble liberated from a deeper oil and gas reservoir, and the gas expands as it rises."

The gas typically dissipates pretty quickly in open areas with some wind. But there's not much that can be done to control them, he said. They have to run their course.

He said the pressure can lift large rocks into the air, and the main danger is the natural gas getting into water sources.

Bruce Bell, chairman of the Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association of Oklahoma, agreed the leak could be caused by natural events such as an earthquake.

If, however, it is natural seepage, Bell said the incident could lead to even more production.

"When the oil business started, one way to find drilling sites was to look for oil seeps," he said. "The seal over a reservoir often is not perfect."

Some eye drilling
The geology in the area makes natural gas seepage unlikely, said Galen Miller, geologist with the Oklahoma Geological Survey, and there has been no seismic activity in the area for at least two weeks.

Miller said the most likely cause is equipment failure in a natural gas well. "It could be an old abandoned well that somebody didn't cap properly," he said. "The most logical explanation to us is that the casing of somebody's well is leaking."

Oil and natural gas wells are encased in pipe and, in some cases, concrete. But if a section of the pipe failed, Miller said, pressure could build up until the gas could surface.

Charles Mankin, director of the Oklahoma Geological Survey at the University of Oklahoma, said: "It's happened before and it'll happen again."

He said the most likely cause is a drill that let natural gas to escape into permeable underground layers.

"It's man-induced," he said. "There is no geologic activity out there that would cause that."



Last three graphs of inset article is based on geologist's speculation rather than his thorough investigation.


29 posted on 12/14/2005 6:36:57 AM PST by sully777 (What Would Brian Boitano Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bd476; cogitator; neverdem; genefromjersey

This is an odd scientific discovery that may or may not portend a future event. Thought this would be an interesting read.


30 posted on 12/14/2005 6:56:52 AM PST by sully777 (What Would Brian Boitano Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Shawnlaw
I keep picturing the mud pits in Yellowstone when reading this. Hope it doesn't smell as bad as that!

My last trip to Yellowstone Park was back in 1990. There were some attractions there that the sulfur smell was so bad I almost retched. Beautiful place, though.
31 posted on 12/14/2005 7:01:10 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: crghill

KSWO out of Lawton had a piece this morning. Evidently Cheapeake Oil has been drilling in the area and it's now thought the drilling has somehow caused the natural gas to burble to the surface. Chesapeake is studying the problem on how to correct it and promises to reimburse people for any damages.


32 posted on 12/14/2005 7:07:09 AM PST by Sally'sConcerns (Native Texan, now in SW Ok..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain

Holy bubbling puddles Batman!


33 posted on 12/14/2005 7:10:51 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/ 1,000 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sully777

It would be interesting if it turned out to be a massive oil field !


34 posted on 12/14/2005 7:28:03 AM PST by genefromjersey (So much to flame;so little time !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
Yes - Click hear:

New Madrid Seismic Zone

35 posted on 12/14/2005 8:10:23 AM PST by QwertyKPH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sully777

Thanks for the Ping, Sully.


36 posted on 12/14/2005 8:13:25 AM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sally'sConcerns

Show me da money!


37 posted on 12/14/2005 8:15:33 AM PST by QwertyKPH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sully777; crghill; Sally'sConcerns
KSWO out of Lawton had a piece this morning. Evidently Cheapeake Oil has been drilling in the area and it's now thought the drilling has somehow caused the natural gas to burble to the surface. Chesapeake is studying the problem on how to correct it and promises to reimburse people for any damages.

With this release of greenhouse gases, how are they going to compensate the world for global warming? We're DOOMED!

38 posted on 12/14/2005 8:19:01 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bd476

As per seismic fault lines, I seem to recall Oklahoma having numerous faults that lead into the New Madrid. IRC local histories of bells ringing out in New York City from the New Madrid quake due to the nature of the ground.

Earthquakes are ruled out in the story, except seismic activity at New Madrid for the past week. Interesting.


39 posted on 12/14/2005 8:22:45 AM PST by sully777 (What Would Brian Boitano Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: QwertyKPH

http://newsok.com/article/1704406/?template=home/main

More information about the Chesapeake well.


40 posted on 12/14/2005 8:27:53 AM PST by berkeleybeej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson