Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airborne Laser Completes Laser Ground Tests
Boeing ^ | December 12, 2005 | Maria McCullough

Posted on 12/12/2005 4:02:19 PM PST by Paul Ross

Airborne Laser Completes Laser Ground Tests

ST. LOUIS, Dec. 12, 2005 -- The Boeing-led [NYSE: BA] Airborne Laser team announced today the successful completion of a series of tests involving its high energy laser at the Systems Integration Lab at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. During this test series, lasing duration and power were demonstrated at levels suitable for the destruction of multiple classes of ballistic missiles. This is the second of two program significant knowledge points planned for 2005.

Airborne Laser's (ABL) megawatt-class Chemical Oxygen Iodine Laser (COIL) is designed and built by Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE: NOC). Lasing tests included more than 70 separate lasing events. The laser has been operated at simulated altitude, and achieved steady state operations under full optical control.

In July 2005, the ABL team completed the year's first knowledge point, which was flight testing of the system's passive mission payload at Edwards Air Force Base. During those tests, the team demonstrated the stability and alignment of the two Beam Control and Fire Control optical benches with the turret. That test also demonstrated the system's pointing and vibration control functions, as well as its ability to acquire targets as directed by the battle management segment.

With the completion of the above milestones for 2005, the program now proceeds to integrated systems testing. The ABL YAL-1A aircraft has transitioned to Boeing's Wichita facility to undergo final aircraft modifications for installation of the High Energy Laser modules and to begin Low Power System Integration-Active ground and flight testing. During active testing, the kilowatt-class illuminator lasers will be integrated and tested to demonstrate target acquisition, fine tracking, pointing and atmospheric compensation. Upon completion of active testing, the YAL-1 will return to Edwards Air Force Base for installation of the High Energy Laser, which will be removed from the System Integration Laboratory. This will be followed by extensive weapon systems testing on the aircraft -- both ground and flight.

"This is a major technological achievement for the Airborne Laser program," said Pat Shanahan, vice president and general manager of Boeing Missile Defense Systems. "Proving the capability of this laser to operate at lethal levels of power and duration moves the system a major step closer to becoming a vital component of the nation's boost phase defense against a ballistic missile threat. We have made continued steady progress on this program breaking new technological ground every day, with each test increment leading to the lethal shoot down milestone."

The ABL consists of a megawatt-class, high-energy Chemical Oxygen Iodine Laser placed on a Boeing 747-400 aircraft. ABL is a key component of the Missile Defense Agency's overall ballistic missile defense architecture. In operation, the ABL's sensor system will autonomously detect and track an enemy's boosting missile, determine its position and destroy it with the high energy laser. The ABL's sensor system also identifies the launch location and predicts the impact location, which is communicated to other elements in the missile defense architecture.

Boeing provides the modified aircraft and battle management segments and is the weapon system integrator. ABL partners include Northrop Grumman, which provides the laser segment, as well as the Beacon Illuminator. Northrop Grumman is the world's leading developer of mega-watt class COIL lasers. Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) is the third partner and provides the beam control / fire control segment which contains state-of-the-art optics for control of the solid state illuminators for tracking and atmospheric compensation as well as the High Energy Laser. Lockheed also provides ABL's flight turret assembly.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abl; airbornelaser; all; boeing; laser; mda; nmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Paul Ross

Only a nose mounted turret ? Just launch the missles behind them ;-)


21 posted on 12/12/2005 6:53:45 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
"...and could only deliver one-ninth the destructive energy per gram as a conventional bomb."

But kinetic energy... That's a very important difference, and the tool probably has a place. For each contractor to survive a theoretical exchange, others must also be successful. [g]
22 posted on 12/12/2005 7:42:58 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Pinging...


23 posted on 12/12/2005 7:49:37 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Thanks for the ping!


24 posted on 12/12/2005 9:43:53 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
Hmm... but what would happen if the enemy warhead [and the body of the missile, if need be] are given high quality mirror finish/coating? These would not degrade by themselves until burning off on re-entry, i.e. uncomfortably close to the intended target.

No, but it would make the missile look quite spectacular on radar, and that much more easier to knock down with something else (THAAD, etc).

25 posted on 12/13/2005 9:31:35 AM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
That is a one of many reasons why the beam isn't truly continuous, the beam is actually pulsed, at a very high rate though, doing this actually allows for more energy to reach the target and do more damage during the engagement
26 posted on 12/13/2005 9:42:27 AM PST by Texas Patriot (Remember.... The Alamo, never forget HOORAHH!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: md2576

The Laser is constantly adjusted by high speed computer to adjust the focal point to the target...otherwise the beam is not as effective...just like a handheld magnifying glass must be sharply focused to light a fire...


27 posted on 12/13/2005 4:15:03 PM PST by Turborules (Liberal Ideas today as always are a Oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Could this shoot down conventional fighter craft...that sort of thing? If so, air wars are obsolete!


28 posted on 12/14/2005 12:41:00 PM PST by mdmathis6 (Proof against evolution:"Man is the only creature that blushes, or needs to" M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
Could this shoot down conventional fighter craft...that sort of thing?

Yes. More than that, it could also intercept Air-to-Air missiles...not just supersonic, but the upcoming next-generation hypersonic AA missiles.

If so, air wars are obsolete!

Uh, not quite. It is certainly a step forward. I would compare it's value to AWACs. It will seriously change the battlescape, and add an additional tool to the arsenal...that leverages all our others. But its still an early unproven prototype, and relatively "primitive" technology with limitations, i.e., the ability to stay airborne on station, within useful range, and operable...all of these factors perhaps impaired by weather...are all issues that need to weighed in every combat situation.

29 posted on 12/15/2005 6:50:23 AM PST by Paul Ross (My idea of American policy toward the Soviet Union is simple...It is this, 'We win and they lose.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

These lasers could theoretically be ship based, correct and could knock down antiship missiles?


30 posted on 12/15/2005 9:40:37 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Proof against evolution:"Man is the only creature that blushes, or needs to" M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
Yes.

That is why the new generation DDX Destroyer/Cruiser is crucial. It is setting the Navy up to be able to deploy Directed Energey weaponry, from rail guns to lasers. This will allow the ships to be secure against the most-dangerous of aerial assaults.

This will then just leave the problem of torpedoes...

31 posted on 12/15/2005 9:47:25 AM PST by Paul Ross (My idea of American policy toward the Soviet Union is simple...It is this, 'We win and they lose.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson