Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EDITORIAL: Interstate 69
Lufkin Daily News ^ | December 11, 2005 | Lufkin Daily News

Posted on 12/12/2005 11:31:23 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Now that Texas Gov. Rick Perry and other officials have pronounced “the federal funding genie” dead, as far as highway construction money goes, it's time to find another way to pay for Interstate 69.

“By the time Washington funds I-69, we'll be driving around in hover cars or whatever,” Perry said Thursday during a meeting of I-69 Alliance members, including Lufkin Mayor Louis Bronaugh, in Houston. “The harsh reality is we cannot wait for Washington, D.C., to solve the problems of this state.”

Perry wants to “resuscitate” I-69 by merging it with his proposed Trans Texas Corridor, which would combine multi-lane highways with railways and utility lines into a network that would, as its name implies, crisscross the state.

Obviously, Lufkin and Angelina County have a huge stake in this issue, as does Nacogdoches. We've been ahead of the game, as far as I-69 goes, for years now, and that will help us if Texas finds a way to start building the thing – with or without federal help.

Where, exactly, the new highway winds through Angelina County will depend on environmental studies that have yet to be completed. A brand new roadway and railway system as massive as Perry is proposing will have a significant impact on our forests, so it's good that the state is taking the time to find the path that least alters our landscape.

If all goes well, we should by mid-2006 have a firm idea of where I-69 – or, more likely at this point, TTC-69 – will traverse through our area.

It is important for Lufkin and Nacogdoches, and our separate and combined economic development efforts, that the corridor be constructed as soon as possible. An interstate that stretches from Mexico to Canada, straight up the middle of the United States, will give us a huge tool to help convince big companies to build or relocate here.

Of course, there's a catch to Perry's plan, since you know the state of Texas is in no position, either, to be handing out transportation dollars: If I-69, or TTC-69, is to be constructed in the foreseeable future, it's going to be done through public-private partnerships. That means toll roads.

We're OK with that. It makes sense that the people who are going to benefit the most from the interstate – both trucking companies and travelers going to or from the Houston area – should be the ones to pay for it. Toll tags like those used in Dallas and Houston make it easy for drivers to keep on trucking, without having to stop to pay the fee. By the time I-69 is actually finished, Angelina and Nacogdoches counties will likely be suffering significant congestion on the current U.S. Highway 59, and the new interstate should provide some measure of relief.

I-69 has looked dead in the water several times now, so the good news is there's still hope for the project. We hope Perry isn't just blowing smoke, and that someone – be it the state or a private partner – starts pouring concrete within the next couple decades.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 85mph; canada; cintra; freetrade; i30; i35; i37; i69; i69ttc; ih30; ih35; ih37; ih69; interstate30; interstate35; interstate37; interstate69; mexico; nafta; privatefunding; rickperry; ricwilliamson; taxes; tedhoughton; texas; tollroads; tolls; transtexascorridor; ttc; ttc35; ttc69; txdot; us281; us59; us77; usa; zachry
Other links discussing I-69 or the Trans-Texas Corridor:

Will lease take a toll?

Perry seeks private funds in push for Interstate 69

Perry cites plans for South Texas corridor

Transportation commissioner tours county

1 posted on 12/12/2005 11:31:25 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; anymouse; AprilfromTexas; B-Chan; barkeep; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


2 posted on 12/12/2005 11:32:10 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I-901: A freeway funded entirely by Washington State Smoking Nazis...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Who's the marketing genius who thought up the name? I can see I-69 t-shirts selling like hotcakes.


3 posted on 12/12/2005 11:33:21 AM PST by Defiant (Dar al Salaam will exist when the entire world submits to American leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"I-69"?

They aren't REALLY gona call it that are they? Oh the horror....I can't wait to hear those gags....

Hmmmmmm. How about "I got mine on Route 69?"

See what I mean??

4 posted on 12/12/2005 11:34:03 AM PST by China Clipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Personally, I think we're way overdue for hover cars anyway!


5 posted on 12/12/2005 11:34:14 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: China Clipper

I-69 is definitely a win-win idea!


6 posted on 12/12/2005 11:35:57 AM PST by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Who's the marketing genius who thought up the name?

The Texas portion of I-69 is eventually supposed to connect to the existing I-69 that currently has a southern terminus at Indianapolis.

7 posted on 12/12/2005 11:42:41 AM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

BTTT


8 posted on 12/12/2005 11:48:44 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: China Clipper

You haven't been to the Detroit aera have you?
"Big Beaver Rd, Exit 69".


9 posted on 12/12/2005 11:51:06 AM PST by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

South Texas death ride

10 posted on 12/12/2005 11:55:53 AM PST by evets (God bless president Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cjshapi

They're not going to fund I-69? That just sucks.


11 posted on 12/12/2005 12:12:46 PM PST by Junior (From now on, I'll stick to science, and leave the hunting alien mutants to the experts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Someone really blew it.


12 posted on 12/12/2005 12:16:05 PM PST by cjshapi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Sorta runs along US69 which is already there.


13 posted on 12/12/2005 1:58:15 PM PST by right right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

I have several I69 Stickers on my motorcycle helmet.. have for years.. as well as a nice bushpilot pin on my jacket, and many other things not really acceptable in polite company as well adoring both.


14 posted on 12/12/2005 2:02:21 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
US 77 is a four lane divided highway between Victoria and Brownsville. It is a freeway in the Rio Grande Valley, and from Harlingen to Robstown (just west of Corpus Christi), there are few towns to bypass. I do not see that it would be terribly expensive, as highway construction goes, to upgrade US 77 to Interstate standards along this stretch. US 59 is mostly four lane divided highway from Victoria to Texarkana. It is a freeway for 30-40 miles on either side of Houston. There would be a need for a number of bypasses around Lufkin, Nacogdoches, Marshall. Kilgore, and Longview. Additionally, there probably should be a more direct route connecting Nacogdoches and Marshall than what US 59 currently uses. It would seem that upgrading US 59 to Interstate standards would be far less expensive, require the state to confiscate far less land, and be far less environmentally friendly than building an entirely new Interstate or toll road. Unlike the Indiana and Arkansas segments of Interstate 69, upgrading US 77 and 59 to Interstate status should not require a tremendous amount of new construction.

Do Governor Perry and other politicians have the best interests of the citizens of Texas or those of foreign based toll road builders at heart?

15 posted on 12/12/2005 3:03:47 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


16 posted on 12/12/2005 9:41:14 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

You and princess leah should meet.


17 posted on 12/12/2005 10:49:11 PM PST by Defiant (Dar al Salaam will exist when the entire world submits to American leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

You're welcome. :-)


18 posted on 12/13/2005 3:15:25 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I-901: A freeway funded entirely by Washington State Smoking Nazis...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson