To: Ichneumon
If an idea isn't "scientifically testable", it's because it has *no* real-world consequences.The presence of organized matter that behaves according to predicatable laws is indeed scientifically testable. It is the stuff of science. To infer from the presence of the same that intelligent design is involved with its presence is no less reasonable than assuming some other agent, which agent (or agents) on the part of evos seems a shade scrappy. Intelligent design is a theory that well explains the whole of the universe, not to mention the practice of science itself.
To: Fester Chugabrew
"The presence of organized matter that behaves according to predicatable laws is indeed scientifically testable."
And is just as much evidence for unintelligent design as it is for intelligent design. There is no way to choose between the two scientifically.
"To infer from the presence of the same that intelligent design is involved with its presence is no less reasonable than assuming some other agent, which agent (or agents) on the part of evos seems a shade scrappy."
Not so. Natural selection is observable. Mutations and genetic recombination are observable. The fossil record is observable. The genetic code is observable. Speciation has been observed. The evidence for evolution is PHYSICAL. The evidence for a deity/God/intelligent designer is NOT physical. ID is not capable of being examined by science, until someone can come up with some physical evidence for the existence of the alleged designer.
739 posted on
12/13/2005 4:15:51 PM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson