Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: somemoreequalthanothers
My theory is that news of attacks are being suppressed to interrupt the goal of the terrorists - which is to amplify the effect of an otherwise puny attack through our mass media, and mass hysteria. It seems to be a reasonable policy to me, even though I'd like to know the facts, if those facts caused the masses to misapprehend the actual risks of air travel, going to the mall, working in an office building, participating in the stock market, etc., I'll do without.

I think that it is good policy to interrupt the terrorists' intent.

163 posted on 12/10/2005 7:11:06 AM PST by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: GregoryFul

I would agree, but I think the American people's right to know the truth of events may be more important.


164 posted on 12/10/2005 7:15:06 AM PST by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson