Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gold prices surge past $522 level
BBC ^ | December 9, 2005 | London BBC

Posted on 12/09/2005 6:01:51 AM PST by DebtAndDelusion

The price of gold has continued to rise in Asian trading, climbing to its highest level since 1981. Gains came despite concerns that the market may be set for a correction and some analysts are now predicting that prices have even higher to go.

Precious metals have been given a boost as investors look to protect themselves against higher inflation and weakening currencies such as the Japanese yen.

Gold climbed as high as $522.70 an ounce, before falling back.

It was hovering around the $521 mark during afternoon trading in Asia.

'Dizzy high'

"There's some profit-taking now, but look at where we are," said Darren Heathcote of NM Rothschild.

"It's broken $520, the target we had yesterday... and it looks like $525 is the next target."

One broker in Tokyo said that: "Gold has been drawing very strong interest from Japanese investors, and I don't think this boom will subside in the near term."

There are a number of factors pushing the price of gold higher.

Gold is seen as a haven from inflation and weakening currencies, although historically, once inflation is taken into account, gold has not proven to be a good investment.

There is also speculation that Asian and European central banks may cut US dollar holdings in favour of gold.

There also is the year-end increase in demand for jewellery, analysts said.

The price of gold has climbed almost 19% this year and has nearly doubled during the past five.

"It's a dizzy high," said Rothschild's Mr Heathcote, but warned that "we are looking at a very overbought market".

"We're looking for a correction. It has to come at some point," he said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barkingatthemoon; blingbling; buymygold; evilfeds; gold; goldbubble; goldbug; goldbuggery; goldfarming; goldgeezer; goldgoldgold; goldmineshafted; goldshills; onetrickpony; oughtamentionthejoos; sansabelttootight; yukoncornelius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last
To: DebtAndDelusion
"I don't think this boom will subside in the near term."

Look for the "smart guys" to get out shortly leaving the novices, who actually believe this or any other market only goes up, holding the bag. The huge spike up in the past several weeks is imo, the last surge before the bottom falls out.

21 posted on 12/09/2005 7:09:30 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

If you take an average of the high and low for each of the years and adjust them for inflation adjust those figures for inflation you will see just how bad an investment gold really is relative to equities.


22 posted on 12/09/2005 7:19:18 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DebtAndDelusion; Fierce Allegiance; martin_fierro; TheBigB; Constitution Day; presidio9; ...
I can't claim to be an economist
How modest of you.

Father and Gramps used to have some terrible arguments about gold. Gramps was an old Bryan supporter and made the cross of gold argument all the time with Father.
Insanity does run in some families. It's a miracle Grandma didn't take the side by side to the both of 'em.

Unfortunately Father bought stocks on margin in 1929.
I guess he can't claim to be an economist either.

Darn Islamics and Asians buying all the gold
I guess only aryans should have the bling.

The working man in this country is getting it from every end.
Gee, that's new, different, and original.

Still got the farm, still got the gold and still have most of my teeth.
How could Maslow miss these in his hierarchy of needs?

Sheesh....

23 posted on 12/09/2005 7:21:46 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
That is true, but if you did buy last year at 375.00 and sold now at 520.00 that's a pretty good take.

(Tax free) :^)

24 posted on 12/09/2005 7:25:36 AM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DebtAndDelusion

If you were half as bright as a bar of gold, you'd be ok.


25 posted on 12/09/2005 7:27:47 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance (I will prevail. I miss my best friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

have most recoved what they lost from the markets post 911?


26 posted on 12/09/2005 7:29:16 AM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

what if you bought at $250.00 during the mid 90's?


27 posted on 12/09/2005 7:30:24 AM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
SLIMMVS WITH THE OBSCURE MASLOW HEIRARCHY OF NEEDS REFERENCE!!!!!

I didn't think anyone thought about that one.

28 posted on 12/09/2005 7:31:23 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Only becuase I couldn't fit him in to and of the stages of Piaget’s Theory of Development. Although, Louis Terman would have to dig a new basement for this guy.


29 posted on 12/09/2005 7:34:01 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

What the hell and I typing?


30 posted on 12/09/2005 7:34:42 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Right, but I was comparing them to equities and was looking at the long term. You will find many stocks that will have done far, far better then gold over the same period of time. Gold is a haven for safety and not growth.


31 posted on 12/09/2005 7:36:42 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

Subtract the inflation and you have your net gain. Considering a 100% gain minus inflation adjustments you still come out ahead.


32 posted on 12/09/2005 7:40:25 AM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I did.....

Historical gold prices - Annual gold bullion prices

Yearly high and low gold price since 1972
Daily London close of spot gold prices

 

Year  

  High 

  Low  

 

 Year 

  High 

  Low  

1972

70.00

44.00

1990

423.75

345.85

1973

126.00

64.00

1991

403.00

344.30

1974

195.00

117.00

1992

359.60

330.20

1975

185.00

135.00

1993

406.70

326.10

1976

142.00

102.00

1994

397.50

369.65

1977

168.00

127.00

1995

396.95

372.40

1978

243.65

165.70

1996

416.25

367.40

1979

524.00

216.55

1997

367.80

283.00

1980

850.00

474.00

1998

314.60

273.40

1981

599.25

391.25

1999

323.50

252.80

1982

488.50

296.75

2000

325.50

264.10

1983

511.50

374.25

2001

291.45

256.65

1984

406.85

303.25

2002 342.75 277.75

1985

340.90

284.25

2003 417.25 319.90

1986

442.75

326.00

2004

454.20 375.00

1987

502.75

390.00

       

1988

485.30

389.05

       

1989

417.15

358.50

       


33 posted on 12/09/2005 7:46:39 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
M1 is flat, not growing at all. M2 is growing 4-5% per year. M3 is growing 8% per year - and just broke $10 trillion. Widest divergence seen.

That sort of thing is usually a sign that bankers have found ways around the controlled variables. There is an endless game central banks and the rest of the banking system play. Central banks control money creation by targeting variable X. Banks come up with ways to leave X essentially unchanged yet create additional effective money Y. Central banks target Y. Banks invent Z. Etc.

Incidentally, CPI measured inflation in the last year was 4.3%, significantly above the 3.2% average since 1982. The Fed has been tightening for a reason.

34 posted on 12/09/2005 7:57:29 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DebtAndDelusion
Gramps was an old Bryan supporter and made the cross of gold argument all the time with Father.

Do you know what the gold vs. silver argument was all about?

35 posted on 12/09/2005 8:07:35 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (The Federal Reserve did not kill JFK. Greenspan was not on the grassy knoll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress
(Tax free) :^)

How do you figure your gold profit would be tax free?

36 posted on 12/09/2005 8:12:31 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (The Federal Reserve did not kill JFK. Greenspan was not on the grassy knoll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Did I say Tax Free? oops..


37 posted on 12/09/2005 8:15:39 AM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DebtAndDelusion

Buying and selling precious metals, like sex, is all about timing.

Back in the '70s I read a great book by Harry Browne with the numbing title "How you can profit from the coming devaluation". I was on vacation and stayed up until 3 a.m. reading it. The guy was spot on. Before I got back from vacation, there was a devaluation. (Devaluation is the government euphenism for bankrupcy - as in a 50% devaluation in effect says the country is bankrupt and will pay off debtors at the rate of half what is owed them.)

Remember the "dual rate" of LBJ? The govt said gold was worth $44 an ounce, but wouldn't redeem any dollars in that (foreign govts could still demand conversion - LBJ talked them into taking silver instead at 95c an ounce, all the while exhorting people not to hoard silver - Gresham's Law* proved once again.). The free market immediately went to $48, when I bought in.

I bailed at $105 an ounce, kissing my hands at what a smart speculator I was - it CAN'T POSSIBLY go any higher. Got back in at $125 and stayed until $525 when I figured that was absolutely the tops. Jesu, what a ride!

Out of all that, what sticks in my mind was walking into a coin shop with $52 face value silver coins and walking out with $1004. Talk about being stunned!

A long time ago, a wise man said that gold was the thermometer of the world's condition, so maybe these Asians know something we don't.

*Bad money drives out the good. If you have two coins, one intrinsically worth more than the other but of equal buying power, which would you keep?


38 posted on 12/09/2005 8:23:04 AM PST by Oatka (Hyphenated-Americans have hyphenated-loyalties -- Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oatka

very good post!


39 posted on 12/09/2005 8:25:43 AM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT; eyedigress
BTW, My HOUSE has appreciated in value MORE than gold in the last 5 years. So I guess you could have bought gold, but you would have been better buying your neighbor's house.

And when you sell your house you can legally exclude $250,000 ($500,000 for a married couple) of profits from capital gains taxes.

40 posted on 12/09/2005 8:30:05 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (The Federal Reserve did not kill JFK. Greenspan was not on the grassy knoll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson