Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Theory of intelligent design making its way into Broward textbooks (Florida)
Sun-sentinel.com ^ | December 9, 2005 | Chris Kahn

Posted on 12/09/2005 3:55:11 AM PST by mlc9852

Broward County on Thursday narrowed its choices for high school Biology I textbooks to two finalists, both of which have been under scrutiny by Christian conservatives who want to change the way students learn about the origin of life.

Both have edited passages about evolution theory during the past few years after receiving complaints from the Discovery Institute. The think tank sponsors research on intelligent design, which argues life is so complicated, it must have been fashioned by a higher being. One of the books also has added a short section on creationism.

(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: crevolist; praisegod; scienceeducation; textbooks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-383 next last
To: b_sharp

Then it may be better for you to just skip over my posts like I do with certain people on these threads. Keeps your blood pressure down.


141 posted on 12/09/2005 1:14:01 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"Well, perhaps they could start with looking for Noah's Ark."

It's been looked for. Nothing yet. Until then... :)


142 posted on 12/09/2005 1:14:02 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
Well, perhaps they could start with looking for Noah's Ark.

Who's "they"? What's to stop "creation" or "ID" scientists from looking (besides their near pathological aversion to primary research)?

143 posted on 12/09/2005 1:15:29 PM PST by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
It's probably somewhere in Turkey. There have, of course, been expeditions over the years but there seems to be a problem accessing the area for political reasons. I've seen a couple of interesting documentaries about the search. I think it will eventually be found.
144 posted on 12/09/2005 1:15:41 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"I want science to investigate whatever can be investigated."

Me too.

"A lot of science is beliefs, isn't it?"

No.

"Well, I guess you call them theories."

Yes. There's a big difference, which you already know.


145 posted on 12/09/2005 1:15:46 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: jonboy
If you have only two possibilities of how the universe came to be, natural or supernatural, unless you are an elitist snob you place both in the text book.

There are two possibilities as to how planets orbit the sun: the inverse square law of gravity, or angels pushing them around. Teach both?

146 posted on 12/09/2005 1:16:41 PM PST by ThinkDifferent (I am a leaf on the wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"It's probably somewhere in Turkey."

Or not.

"There have, of course, been expeditions over the years but there seems to be a problem accessing the area for political reasons. I've seen a couple of interesting documentaries about the search. I think it will eventually be found."

Now THAT is a belief.


147 posted on 12/09/2005 1:16:42 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: atlaw

See my post at 144. Seems some serious archaeologists would be interested.


148 posted on 12/09/2005 1:16:47 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent

Where does the Bible say angels push the earth around?


149 posted on 12/09/2005 1:17:25 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
Definitions are by definition what someone says they are. I'm not convinced.

It is amazing to me that you are trying to change even the common definitions used in science, much as the Kansas folks had to change the definition of science.

And you didn't answer my question.

150 posted on 12/09/2005 1:17:50 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
. . . the driver crossing the bridge trusts that the builder relied on good old, non-theological engineering principals, and not the Bible, when constructing it.

Actually the driver most likely could care less whether the designer believed in God or not. But he would care even less if the established principles applicable to both the builder and the bridge were void of intelligent design, for there would be no bridge, nor a gap to be bridged, nor a driver to cross the bridge, nor a toll, nor two Freepers to discuss the contingencies.

And the same holds true with biology, correct? If not, why not?

Biology, like any other discipline, can be undertaken without stating or assuming "God is forever outside the purview of science."

151 posted on 12/09/2005 1:17:52 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

"You don't really want science investigating beliefs, now do you?"

Hypothesis = belief

Does that answer your question?


152 posted on 12/09/2005 1:19:26 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
. . . the inverse square law of gravity, or angels pushing them around.

Maybe the former is just a common way of stating the latter.

153 posted on 12/09/2005 1:19:36 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]


The CrevoSci Archive
Just one of the many services of Darwin Central
"The Conspiracy that Cares"

CrevoSci threads for the past week:

  1. 2005-12-09 Dog's Genome Could Provide Clues to Disorders in Humans
  2. 2005-12-09 Giant Asian Ape and Humans Coexisted, Might Have Interacted
  3. 2005-12-09 Movement Of Earth's North Magnetic Pole Accelerating Rapidly [No Doubt Bush's Fault!]
  4. 2005-12-09 Theory of intelligent design making its way into Broward textbooks (Florida)
  5. 2005-12-09 Whales, ostrich evolved in India
  6. 2005-12-08 Ancient drought 'changed history'
  7. 2005-12-08 Anti-creationism prof (KansasU) quits department chair
  8. 2005-12-08 Dog genome sequence and analysis published in 'Nature'
  9. 2005-12-08 Funny Cartoon!
  10. 2005-12-08 God, Science [evolution], and the Kooky Kansans Who Love them Both
  11. 2005-12-08 Huge New Virus Defies Classification
  12. 2005-12-08 Man's best friend shares most genes with humans
  13. 2005-12-08 Prof. Critical of Creationism Resigns Post
  14. 2005-12-08 Similar stem cells in insect and human gut (Fruit flies are 'tiny distant cousins'?)
  15. 2005-12-08 Students Denounce Reported Assault on Prof. Who Mocked Christian Fundamentalists
  16. 2005-12-08 WHAT HAPPENED TO PAUL MIRECKI? (Phony Hate Crime Alert)
  17. 2005-12-07 Creation, Evolution, and Thomas Aquinas
  18. 2005-12-07 Hobbits May Be Earliest Australians
  19. 2005-12-07 Introduction: The Illusion of Design [Richard Dawkins]
  20. 2005-12-07 Kansas U. Religion Chair Mirecki Resigns Department Post
  21. 2005-12-07 KU professor steps down as chairman
  22. 2005-12-07 Live Longer With Evolution? Evidence May Lie in Fruit Flies
  23. 2005-12-07 Mirecki mum on details of beating
  24. 2005-12-07 Officers clarify Mirecki attack details
  25. 2005-12-07 Plaintiffs' Proposed Findings in the Dover Evolution/ID Trial
  26. 2005-12-07 Researchers Decode Dog Genome
  27. 2005-12-06 Dinosaur poop shows grass is older than it seems
  28. 2005-12-06 New Carnivore discovered (strange pic)
  29. 2005-12-06 Professor beaten; attackers cite KU creationism class
  30. 2005-12-06 Why Fight Over Intelligent Design?
  31. 2005-12-05 Intelligent design’s long march to nowhere
  32. 2005-12-05 Mirecki hospitalized after beating (KU Relig. prof. who mocked religion)
  33. 2005-12-05 Science Grads, Where Are You? (Intel chief bemoans US science edu)
  34. 2005-12-05 Strange New Carnivore Species Sighted On Borneo
  35. 2005-12-04 Hume, Reid, and Signs of Intelligence
  36. 2005-12-03 Childbirth: Flawed Babies Need Not Apply
  37. 2005-12-03 Citizen MD [American Medical Association op-ed against Intelligent Design]
  38. 2005-12-03 Gene may affect IQ in males, scientists say
  39. 2005-12-03 Intelligent Design Might Be Meeting Its Maker

CrevoSci Thread Count, 2005 YTD:  1245


On This Date in CrevoSci History

  1. 2004-12-09 Darwin under fire (again): Intelligent design vs. evolution
  2. 2004-12-09 Human ancestors started eating meat, evolution served up a healthy bonus.< eata this Peta >
  3. 2004-12-09 Stupid Dino Tricks
  4. 2003-12-09 Changing One Gene Launches New Fly Species

Longest CrevoSci Thread Ever


Lost CrevoSci Battlefields (Pulled or Locked Threads)

  1. 2005-11-15 'Perception' gene tracked humanity's evolution, scientists say
  2. 2004-04-27 Stop Teaching Our Kids this Evolution Claptrap!
  3. 2003-10-29 The Mystery of the Missing Links (Intelligent Design vs. Evolution)
  4. 2003-10-27 Physics Nobelist Takes Stand on Evolution
  5. 2003-10-23 Gene Found for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
  6. 2003-10-21 Artificial Proteins Assembled from Scratch
  7. 2003-09-23 Solar System Formation Questions
  8. 2003-09-17 Agreement of the Willing - Free Republic Science Threads
  9. 2003-07-18 Unlikely Group May Revive Darwin Debate [Evolution v. Creationism]
  10. 2003-07-02 Unlocking the Mystery of 'Unlocking the Mystery of Life'
  11. 2003-06-26 Darwin Faces a New Rival
  12. 2003-06-06 Amazing Creatures
  13. 2002-09-13 Oldest Known Penis Is 100 Million Years Old
  14. 2002-04-10 (Creationists) CRSC Correction
  15. 2001-11-10 Alabama to continue biology textbook warning sticker
  16. 2001-11-06 Warming makes mosquito evolve, University of Oregon scientists find
  17. 2001-08-28 The Ultimate Creation vs. Evolution Resource [6th Revision]
  18. 2001-08-26 A Scientific Account of the Origin of Life on Earth [Thread I]
  19. 2001-01-13 A Christian Understanding of Intelligent Design
  20. 2000-11-15 Evolutionism Receives Another Hard Blow
  21. 2000-10-10 Another Lost Generation?
  22. 2000-08-30 Evil-Ution
  23. 1999-11-14 Creationism's Success Past 5 Years: (Gallup: 1 in 10 hold secular evolutionist perspective)

CrevoSci Warrior Freepdays for the month of December:

  1. 1999-12-03 Aquinasfan
  2. 2002-12-06 Archangelsk
  3. 2004-12-29 b_sharp
  4. 2000-12-10 bdeaner
  5. 2000-12-29 BedRock
  6. 2004-12-03 bobdsmith
  7. 2004-12-15 Catholic54321
  8. 2004-12-14 Chiapet
  9. 1998-12-24 dead
  10. 1999-12-17 dennisw
  11. 2004-12-18 dervish
  12. 2000-12-13 Dr. I. C. Spots
  13. 2001-12-13 e_engineer
  14. 2000-12-26 Fester Chugabrew
  15. 1998-12-23 Frapster
  1. 2002-12-20 furball4paws
  2. 2003-12-21 gspz
  3. 1997-12-08 Gumlegs
  4. 2003-12-05 Guydude
  5. 2002-12-01 HalfFull
  6. 2002-12-18 Happy2BMe
  7. 2000-12-01 I_Publius
  8. 2004-12-27 indcons
  9. 1998-12-07 JAWs
  10. 2002-12-10 john_baldacci_is_a_commie
  11. 2000-12-13 johnandrhonda
  12. 1997-12-05 Ken H
  13. 1999-12-25 kjam22
  14. 2004-12-30 leight
  15. 1997-12-09 longshadow
  1. 1999-12-29 Mensch
  2. 2002-12-07 Milltownmalbay
  3. 2004-12-03 mlc9852
  4. 2002-12-06 new cruelty
  5. 2001-12-25 nickcarraway
  6. 2003-12-02 PetroniusMaximus
  7. 1997-12-08 Pfesser
  8. 1999-12-17 Publius6961
  9. 2002-12-13 qam1
  10. 2000-12-09 rcocean
  11. 2000-12-02 rdb3
  12. 1999-12-24 RightWhale
  13. 2000-12-01 rwfromkansas
  14. 1997-12-06 saquin
  15. 2002-12-08 Sentis
  1. 1999-12-08 shrinkermd
  2. 2001-12-04 SpiderMBA
  3. 2004-12-17 Stark_GOP
  4. 2001-12-19 Steve Eisenberg
  5. 2000-12-08 Stultis
  6. 2000-12-08 Sub-Driver
  7. 2001-12-27 Tailgunner Joe
  8. 2002-12-10 tbird5
  9. 2004-12-06 Thatcherite
  10. 1998-12-10 TheOtherOne
  11. 1999-12-07 Tolerance Sucks Rocks
  12. 1998-12-14 VadeRetro
  13. 2000-12-29 Virginia-American
  14. 1998-12-22 VOA
  15. 1997-12-18 Waco

In Memoriam
Fallen CrevoSci Warriors:


  1. 1LongTimeLurker

  2. Ahriman

  3. ALS

  4. angelo

  5. Area Freeper

  6. Aric2000

  7. Askel5

  8. Asphalt

  9. biblewonk

  10. bluepistolero

  11. churchillbuff

  12. claptrap

  13. codebreaker

  14. Con X-Poser

  15. ConservababeJen

  16. dbbeebs

  17. Destro

  18. DittoJed2

  19. dob

  20. Ed Current

  1. f.Christian
  2. followerofchrist
  3. freeparella
  4. general_re
  5. goodseedhomeschool
  6. gopwinsin04
  7. gore3000
  8. Happy2BMe
  9. Helms
  10. IllumiNOTi
  11. JediGirl
  12. JesseShurun
  13. JethroHathaway
  14. JFK_Lib
  15. jlogajan
  16. JoeSchem
  17. john_baldacci_is_a_commie
  18. Justice Avenger
  19. Kevin Curry
  20. kharaku
  1. knowquest
  2. Land of the Irish
  3. Le-Roy
  4. malakhi
  5. Marathon
  6. masked face doom
  7. medved
  8. Merdoug
  9. metacognative
  10. mikeharris65
  11. missyme
  12. Modernman
  13. Morris Hattrick
  14. n4sir
  15. neoconsareright
  16. NoKinToMonkeys
  17. Ogmios
  18. OnlyinAmerica
  19. peg the prophet
  20. Phaedrus
  1. Phoroneus
  2. pickemuphere
  3. ReasonedThought
  4. ret_medic
  5. RickyJ
  6. RJCogburn
  7. SeaLion
  8. Selkie
  9. Shubi
  10. SplashDog
  11. Stingy Dog
  12. The Loan Arranger
  13. the lone rider
  14. Tomax
  15. tpaine
  16. Truth666
  17. twittle
  18. Unalienable
  19. WaveThatFlag
  20. xm177e2

Bring back Modernman and SeaLion!


The
official stout
of Darwin Central

Glossary of Terms

Assumption: Premise: a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn; "on the assumption that he has been injured we can infer that he will not to play"
Belief: Any cognitive content (perception) held as true; religious faith
CrevoCreation vs. evolution
CrevoSciCreation vs. evolution/Science
CrevoSci Warriors:  Those who take part on CrevoSci threads
Data: factual information, especially information organized for analysis or used to reason or make decisions
Dogma: a religious doctrine that is proclaimed as true without proof
Fact: When an observation is confirmed repeatedly and by many independent and competent observers, it can become a fact
Freepday:  The day a Freeper joined Free Republic
Hypothesis: A tentative theory about the natural world; a concept that is not yet verified but that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena; "a scientific hypothesis that survives experimental testing becomes a scientific theory"; "he proposed a fresh theory of alkalis that later was accepted in chemical practices"
Impression: A vague idea in which some confidence is placed; "his impression of her was favorable"; "what are your feelings about the crisis?"; "it strengthened my belief in his sincerity"; "I had a feeling that she was lying"
Law: A generalization that describes recurring facts or events in nature; "the laws of thermodynamics"
Observation: Any information collected with the senses
Theory: A well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses"; "true in fact and theory"

154 posted on 12/09/2005 1:21:04 PM PST by Junior (From now on, I'll stick to science, and leave the hunting alien mutants to the experts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
Hypothesis = belief

Does that answer your question?

No. As used in science the two are not equivalent.

155 posted on 12/09/2005 1:21:49 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
And I curse those atheistic engineers for their Godless mathematics every time I cross the Verrazano Narrows.

Actually, I think crossing some of the bridges in the Tri-State area is an act of faith in itself.

156 posted on 12/09/2005 1:23:58 PM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Madeleine Ward
"Man it's a hoot to watch these threads.

More fun to contribute to them, you might try it some day.

"I just don't get it. If you evolutionists are so darn certain, why are you so scared of intelligent design.

Who said anything about being afraid? Angry that pseudoscience is being pushed into the schools maybe, but not afraid. I also take part in a forum that debunks pseudoscience such as homeopathy; does that mean I'm afraid of quacks?

"Do you think people are stupid? Do you think that they aren't capable of weighing one against the other and deciding which has more merit?

Most people accept whatever they've been taught as children. If you think people will take the time to really weigh the pros and cons you need to look at all the people who believe in astrology, homeopathy, naturopathic medicine, crystals, pyramid power and so on.

"You guys actually make people want to investigate intelligent design by the knee-jerk response you have to it.

The reaction of science to ID is not knee-jerk in any sense of the term. Science knows more about ID than the majority of ID proponents. This is why people like Behe and Dembski find they need to constantly modify their hypotheses. Science points out the problems, and IDists try to make changes. This is good, but so far ID still hasn't made it to the science platform, they're still loading it on the truck at the factory

"Because you doth protest too much, IMO.

Had science protested enough, let alone too much, there would be no attempts to push it into the schools.

157 posted on 12/09/2005 1:26:47 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp

"Angry that pseudoscience is being pushed into the schools maybe, but not afraid. I also take part in a forum that debunks pseudoscience such as homeopathy; does that mean I'm afraid of quacks?"

You mean like cabbage preventing/curing bird flu? Or medicine like the Chinese have practiced for hundreds of years?


158 posted on 12/09/2005 1:29:10 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: jonboy
"If anyone thinks me a fool for being a creationist and intelligent design believer that is their right. I also have the right to think less of their point of view as well. The debate is a good thing to have. It is those who stifle the debate who seem to have an agenda other than getting to the truth in mind."

I doubt you are a fool. I do suspect, however that you have been given strawman information of evolution rather than accurate information.

159 posted on 12/09/2005 1:32:24 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Belief: Any cognitive content (perception) held as true; religious faith.

Two meanings, the former of which comfortably applies to a hypothesis.


160 posted on 12/09/2005 1:33:11 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-383 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson