Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Naked Shorting is a crime. It is analogous to counterfeiting. In fact one can think of it as counterfeiting shares of stock or other unit of a security. It involves selling into a market shares that do not exist, then disappearing with the cash generated or having the cash laundered and untraceable.

Naked shorting has driven alot of companies into the ground causing many investors to be ruined.

Read the article and you may realize this scandal dwarfs that of Enron.

Also read how the SEC appears impotent in dealing with enforcement.

And note as well the involvement of George Soros' Quantum Hedge Fund.

If Republicans had a spine they would hold hearings on 'Naked Shorting' and likely snag some high profile individuals with an investigation.

1 posted on 12/08/2005 10:33:28 PM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

While it is considered illegal in the US, as an example, the german stock market easily allows it, and you can massively naked short american stocks from it.

The germans, and other euro countries day in and day out do a lot of damage against the US economy by exerting a ton of fake shorting pressure on our securities to keep them down. And you bet your ass guys like Soros are involved in this as well.

Considering we are entering the 4th year of the current bull market in 2006, many of our stocks haved stayed undervalued due to all this artificial shorting pressure.


2 posted on 12/08/2005 10:44:54 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage
These shorties have been as you say destroying good companies. I have been going in out of NFI for years now because of them. There a lot of so called financial gurus who write for WSJ who are likely part of the scam Herb Greenberg amongst them. A great source of info on all this is in Yahoo Financial message boards.
3 posted on 12/08/2005 10:46:10 PM PST by Boiler Plate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage
Also read how the SEC appears impotent in dealing with enforcement.

I think impotent is the wrong word. Complicit is more like it.

Same with the NASD. They could improve things if they wanted to. But they dont want to because their members are profiting handsomely from the thievery.

4 posted on 12/08/2005 10:52:28 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage

Some clarification here.

Shorting in the stock market is the act of selling a share of a company with the intent of follow up "buy" (usualy in a short period of time) at a lower price. The net effect within a brokerage house, that the broker will "borrow" a share from one customer, sell it, give the cash to the person who did the shorting and when the follow on buy order gets filled, the broker then replaces the "borrowed" share. The share owner receives the same value (1 share for 1 share) and perhaps some minor interest payment, the seller receives the proceeds of the sell but then has to buy back the stock at a HOPEFULLY lower price point. In essence, the person doing the short, pockets the price difference on a down swing (minus any brokerage commissions of course). This is perfectly legal.

A NAKED short is doing all of this WITHOUT A COVERING STOCK! This is esentually electronic counterfeiting stock certificates which SHOULD be illegal and get you jail time but the SEC has not enforced or to my knowledge, even had a single public trial of anyone for naked shorting.

One form of a naked short with a brokerage house is essentually conducting the sell but recording the "borrow" of the stock as a dollar transaction on their books. This creates a downward preasure on the stock that is not controled by supply and demand. Without the covering stock, the brokerage firm could in theory, sell as many shares as they wanted and keep piling up thier accounting books with ledger entries that they "owe" stocks (need to buy the shares back). But if their is no policing to drive the brokers to re-purchase those shares within a short time period, then there is a artificial devaluation of the stock. Something that hurts all the other investors and the company itself.


5 posted on 12/08/2005 10:59:53 PM PST by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage
The whole report seems ominous, but it hurts my hair to read it.

Could it have been shortened to:

Dear (401k, IRA and General Individual Investor),
You're screwed, we win; but then, we always do.

Thanks
George S. and the Boys

7 posted on 12/09/2005 1:02:12 AM PST by leadhead (It’s a duty and a responsibility to defeat them. But it's also a pleasure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage

Uh, McCain's hearings on steroids in baseball was far more important than this.


9 posted on 12/09/2005 3:52:55 AM PST by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage

The well connected people doing the short selling have bought off all the politians. There will be no hearings, no grand juries, no indictments and no prosecutions.

I wonder if this is why the Fed has announced going stealth with M3 statistics next year. Maybe they have to clean up this mess.


11 posted on 12/09/2005 5:52:24 AM PST by hubbubhubbub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson