Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Artillery's new guns increase range, accuracy
DND/Canadian Forces ^ | 2005-12-02 | Master Corporal Dennis Power

Posted on 12/08/2005 3:29:45 PM PST by Clive

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: Eaker; humblegunner

Ouch!


41 posted on 12/08/2005 4:36:59 PM PST by Darksheare (Bonafide Henchman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

The projectile will tend to align itself with its direction of flight due to aerodynamics. Since it is spinning, the gyroscopic effect will cause the nose to turn to one side during flight, which will cause the projectile to divert from a simple arc. The mechanics have been worked out, but considerable training is necessary for the crew to attain accuracy.


42 posted on 12/08/2005 4:38:49 PM PST by RightWhale (Not transferable -- Good only for this trip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Yeah!

The M119 isn't air droppable if memory serves.
At least we weren't told we could do that.
Considering how often we broke stuff on it, I'd say the M119 isn't air droppable.
Helo portable, yes.
Air droppable, no.

So the M777 has that on my old unit.
*chuckle*

Has to be pretty tough to be air droppable.


43 posted on 12/08/2005 4:38:56 PM PST by Darksheare (Bonafide Henchman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

"--this will seem like a dumb question, but I'm not at all familiar with heavy artillery"

No questions are dumb. Questions are inanimate and therefore be neither smart nor dumb. There can only be dumb question askers. Anyway, it is a good question. So now I will give you a stupid answer. I am not familiar with heavy artillery either.

"--the projectile, spun by the rifling, starts out at the angle of the barrel of the artillery piece. At what angle does it contact the target at say 30 km-?"

I would say that it will hit at the same angle that it was fired at. If the barrell elevation is 45 degrees, then it will hit the target at 45 degrees. The shell should arc in a very nice parabola shape.


44 posted on 12/08/2005 4:41:30 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
That concept would make my day.
90+ lbs. of badass in a 40 km circle in two minutes!!!!
I think you may be right regarding the Osprey.
45 posted on 12/08/2005 4:44:07 PM PST by TWhiteBear (Down is now officially up. The New York Times said so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Yeah I'd say....


46 posted on 12/08/2005 4:48:30 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Pantel mount on the M119 is notoriously touchy about what you do to it.
It'll survive jarring jolts, like running over rocks potholes and foxholes.
But it won't survive being leaned on by the Corporal, and it won't survive an air drop and stay accurate.


47 posted on 12/08/2005 4:51:04 PM PST by Darksheare (Bonafide Henchman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

LOL....

the M-16 is tougher than that :)


48 posted on 12/08/2005 4:52:37 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Of course, our Corporal was a huge guy with a near two and a half foot wide shoulder width...


49 posted on 12/08/2005 4:56:15 PM PST by Darksheare (Bonafide Henchman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

LOL!


50 posted on 12/08/2005 4:57:34 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Given that we have 24/7 air support with pinpoint bombing, why do we need arty?

Artillery is the same as calvary against tanks - outmoded and dead.


51 posted on 12/08/2005 5:01:04 PM PST by Prost1 (I get my news at Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

How do you suppose the "drop" this? Slide out the back of a C-130 on a skid, or by chute?


52 posted on 12/08/2005 5:02:57 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

the-they


53 posted on 12/08/2005 5:04:22 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Thanks for the post.


54 posted on 12/08/2005 5:13:43 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prost1

Less pilots get killed with this system. Sometimes an old concept is better. This is a standoff system. Less men are put at risk. Every hour a plane flies there are 48 hours of maintenance done on the plane, etc. A very cost effective system.


55 posted on 12/08/2005 5:14:46 PM PST by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Ben Chad; Cannonette

Yeah, baby.


56 posted on 12/08/2005 5:16:21 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Kandahar Airfield -- “We’re not on the edge of the world, but we can see it from here")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank; Darksheare

Its not dumb. The range depends on both the angle and explosive force propelling the round. You will typically get the best range from a 45 degree angle. Darksheare worked with artillery so he will know more than I.


57 posted on 12/08/2005 5:16:44 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep; Darksheare
How do you suppose they "drop" this? Slide out the back of a C-130 on a skid, or by chute?

I would guess chute, but let's ask an expert!

Hey Darks, come here a minute!

58 posted on 12/08/2005 5:18:37 PM PST by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - I will never take Dix or El Roy off of my ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

They're claiming it light, but the look of the barrel alone, I'd guesstimate from the picture to weigh in at least four tons...


59 posted on 12/08/2005 5:23:36 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

60 posted on 12/08/2005 5:24:47 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Kandahar Airfield -- “We’re not on the edge of the world, but we can see it from here")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson