Posted on 12/07/2005 8:32:56 PM PST by neverdem
Hillary Clinton is co-sponsoring a bill to criminalize the burning of the American flag. Her supporters would characterize this as an attempt to find a middle way between those who believe that flag-burning is constitutionally protected free speech and those who want to ban it, even if it takes a constitutional amendment. Unfortunately, it looks to us more like a simple attempt to have it both ways.
Senator Clinton says she opposes a constitutional amendment to outlaw flag-burning. In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that flag-burning was protected by the First Amendment. But her bill, which is sponsored by Senator Robert Bennett, Republican of Utah, is clearly intended to put the issue back before the current, more conservative, Supreme Court in hopes of getting a turnaround.
It's hard to see this as anything but pandering - there certainly isn't any urgent need to resolve the issue. Flag-burning hasn't been in fashion since college students used slide rules in math class and went to pay phones at the student union to call their friends. Even then, it was a rarity that certainly never put the nation's security in peril.
The bill attempts to equate flag-burning with cross-burning, which the Supreme Court, in a sensible and carefully considered 2003 decision, said could be prosecuted under certain circumstances as a violation of civil rights law. It's a ridiculous comparison. Burning a cross is a unique act because of its inextricable connection to the Ku Klux Klan and to anti-black violence and intimidation. A black American who wakes up to see a cross burning on the front lawn has every right to feel personally, and physically, threatened. Flag-burning has no such history. It has, in fact, no history of being directed against any target but the government.
Mrs. Clinton says her current position grew...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Oh what a tangled web we weave when we triangulate to deceive.
Hillary triangulating and the Slimes disapprove.
I would be surpise if espionage could be indited with THIS congress..
Triangulation leading to strangulation.
The primary "rule of thumb":
Bill is bad, Hillary is EVIL.
Who in their right mind can't see through this?
Of course, the clintons are a couple of pander bears.
Hillary is getting desperate.
Pooah wittle Hillawy, which powitical bed will be Just Wight???
As do I. Lousy, hate-filled, perhaps, but free speech.
Flag burning really isn't the issue. Wooing and appeasing gullible conservatives/Christians/America lovers is the issue.
Remember: Bill is bad, Hillary is EVIL.
The NY Times had an editorial against Hillary and her actions? I think I am going to faint!
I'm waiting for her to wrap herself in the Confederate flag and shoot beer cans with a 12 guage.
Until the video game industry held a fund raiser for her.
What to do. Poll numbers are sagging. No one believes Hilly has any principles, thus reminding everyone of her lying, traitorous husband.
I know. Let's outlaw burning the flag as a sop to right-wing America!
I was for flag burning before I was against it."
Wait . . . wait . . . it's coming to me now . . . oh, yes! Stupid me! [insert sound of open palm striking forehead] She beat Kerry with the extended 60 Minutes interview/Monica Lewinsky performance dichotomy:
"I was against being the kind of woman who just stands behind her man before I was for being that kind of woman."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.