This letter takes a bit different approach to the Bush lied issue and has received some notice here in Oregon, so I decided to post it. However, I don't know if it should be posted separately, or as a comment to the post of an article. I would sure appreciate feedback from you folks about what the proper appraoch would be for something like this. Thank you.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Retain Mike
Ya might want to correct your title.
2 posted on
12/07/2005 12:27:59 PM PST by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: Retain Mike; Admin Moderator
You might want to post a link to this drivel.
3 posted on
12/07/2005 12:28:45 PM PST by
Howlin
("Victory is not a strategy. " ``Jack Murtha 11/18/05)
To: Retain Mike
Busd...Busd...busd...
4 posted on
12/07/2005 12:28:45 PM PST by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
To: Retain Mike
Um, next time you might want to check your headline before posting.
6 posted on
12/07/2005 12:29:29 PM PST by
La Enchiladita
(What Child is this, who laid to rest in Mary's arms, is sleeping ....?)
To: Retain Mike
Make your links work.
Overall good approach to the issue.
Also, in addition to all this, there is evidence of WMDs moved out of the country during the long period leading up to our invasion. It seems that no one on either side of the aisle has the courage to address this possibility. Oh, I know that throws gasoline on the fires of dealing with Syria and Iran, hence the cowardice. But still, it needs to be addressed.
8 posted on
12/07/2005 12:31:32 PM PST by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: Retain Mike
Why would Bush lie about WMDs? I mean, if he knows there aren't really any there, he knows he going to get caught on this. Why would he lie?
9 posted on
12/07/2005 12:32:31 PM PST by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: Retain Mike
ib not gonna borer readin somtin so badly tiped.
Owl_Eagle
(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
it was probably sarcasm)
10 posted on
12/07/2005 12:33:42 PM PST by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Retain Mike
I like the approach...
One problem though. The libs will simply counter that the Dims made these comments because Bush "cooked" the intelligence. A lie, we know. But it would help if you got the statements made by Dims during the 90's when Bush wasn't anywhere near a position to "cook" the intelligence.
FYI...
11 posted on
12/07/2005 12:35:10 PM PST by
nuffsenuff
(Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
To: Retain Mike
Send this to Hannity, I don't think he knows about this (S)
12 posted on
12/07/2005 12:35:22 PM PST by
BallyBill
(U.S. Armed Forces.. In It ..To Win It!!)
To: Retain Mike
Busd is worse than Hitlek.
13 posted on
12/07/2005 12:36:06 PM PST by
atomicpossum
(Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
To: Retain Mike
Busd, eh? Well, you might want to post a link to this, if it actually lasts more than a few minutes.
14 posted on
12/07/2005 12:37:31 PM PST by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Retain Mike
Links are good if you want to be taken seriesly.
15 posted on
12/07/2005 12:38:45 PM PST by
johnny7
(“You have a corpse in a car, minus a head, in the garage. Take me to it.”)
To: Retain Mike
To: Retain Mike
New Dem motto
Lieberman Lied.. (add stuff here)
21 posted on
12/07/2005 12:44:42 PM PST by
xmission
To: Retain Mike
Somebody named "Busd" lied about someone's witty reply? What exactly was the retort?
To: Retain Mike
37 posted on
12/07/2005 12:58:56 PM PST by
Zacs Mom
(Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
To: Retain Mike
38 posted on
12/07/2005 12:59:12 PM PST by
dighton
To: Retain Mike
Great points, but not too well written. Has no "snap."
40 posted on
12/07/2005 1:33:33 PM PST by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry......)
To: Retain Mike
If you look it says 2002. The RATS talking point says they were given bad information by the White House. That is theie gripe.
What they should be pointing at is the ABC news story in 1999 about the WMD, The TIME magazine article about Saddams weapons, the Deulfer report, The NY Times, WAPO and LA Times articles and the European intelligence community as well as Clintons bill to overthrow Hussein.
Basically the RATS are trying to rewrite history to say pre 9/11 this never happened.
41 posted on
12/07/2005 1:37:40 PM PST by
EQAndyBuzz
(Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
To: Retain Mike
42 posted on
12/07/2005 1:41:54 PM PST by
darkangel82
(Never underestimate the stupidity of government.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
