Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massachusetts gun registration
State of Mass. ^ | Rep Toomey

Posted on 12/07/2005 11:17:00 AM PST by absolootezer0

one of my friends just sent me this link to a proposed change to the Massachusetts carry laws. full text here


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: banglist; registration
i didn't see this posted already, if its a duplicate please delete.
1 posted on 12/07/2005 11:17:01 AM PST by absolootezer0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

Look at who's behind this ridiculous bill: all Dems from the eastern part of the state.

Is anyone surprised?


2 posted on 12/07/2005 11:40:22 AM PST by Gefreiter ("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter

This is as racist a gun law as the Louisiana Black Code. $250,000 insurance? Does that include Off-Duty policemen or Policemen who are watching Holes being dug?


3 posted on 12/07/2005 11:45:38 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

Hey this just might work.

Wanna cut down on vehicular deaths. Make every driver carry a $1 million insurance policy...

When cars are illegal only criminals will have cars...

Stupid people.


4 posted on 12/07/2005 11:52:12 AM PST by Syntyr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

How is it racist? I mean, it doesn't say that only one race has to have insurance.

Here's a what-if for you: What if one of your guns is stolen, and subsequently used in a felony. Say someone is shot with it. Will the insurance you purchased for your weapon be expected to pay the damages?

I dunno, man. I just don't understand this bill. Are people who are already lawful gun owners tied to gun violence so much more often than street scum that the lawful owners have to be insured...?


5 posted on 12/07/2005 11:52:38 AM PST by Gefreiter ("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter

the idea is to get rid of concealed carry. after all, unless its due to negligence (like i leave my weapon in a public bathroom) why should i have to cover damages for a weapon of mine that was stolen? that would be along the same lines of suing the company for making the product. i wouldn't be the one who did the damage, so i shouldn't be held responsible.


6 posted on 12/07/2005 12:13:43 PM PST by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

I don't know that they are limiting themselves to abolishing concealed carry. There's no reason, inasmuch as any of this is based on reasoning at all, that this bill's language could not apply to all firearms.

And did you notice that there proposal of having a member of GOAL sit on the board that would oversee this system?

I would hope GOAL would fight this legislation like animals.


7 posted on 12/07/2005 12:31:34 PM PST by Gefreiter ("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter
This is a racist bill in that:

1) Most of the low-income folks in Massachusetts are Hispanic or Black.

2) If you're low-income (Hispanic or Black) you probably can't afford the additional insurance policy, which will be exceedingly high, because you probably live in a poor neighborhood, where crime is a problem.

Therefore, if you're Hispanic or Black you'll be hurt by this bill while rich White folk will not. It's racist.

Haven't you been paying attention to liberal logic all these years?

8 posted on 12/07/2005 12:54:17 PM PST by USMC79to83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: USMC79to83

I hear you. It is a backhanded (read this as sleazy) way for the Dems to take guns from the hands of the poor and minorities without actually saying that they are doing so.

They will probably pass this on Christmas Eve, when nobody is looking.


9 posted on 12/07/2005 6:25:23 PM PST by SpinyNorman (The ACLU empowers terrorists and criminals, weakens America, and degrades our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USMC79to83

USMC,
Oh, right liberal *ahem* logic.

Maybe in that way the current poplicies are already racist. As you probably know, in MA the issuing authoirty for LTC is the local PD. And the most urban areas of the state, which is also where the largest non-white populations live, are the least likely to issue Class A licenses.

GO out into the rural areas, and it's no sweat assuming you've jumped all the other hoops and the checks clear. My wife's not even a citizen and she got hers in 2 weeks.


10 posted on 12/08/2005 4:58:02 AM PST by Gefreiter ("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

"WTF"


11 posted on 12/08/2005 5:00:54 AM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USMC79to83

actually, its not that bad. someone on another site told me that he has some NRA sponsored $250k liability insurance policy that costs him $254/ year.


12 posted on 12/08/2005 5:46:24 AM PST by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson