To: grey_whiskers; Alamo-Girl; hosepipe; marron; Right Wing Professor; aNYCguy; snarks_when_bored
(What are later "electro-archaeologists" or extraterrestrial aliens doing their own SETI going to make of the juxtaposition of ABC's Nightline with ads for Oprah or Britney Spears?) LOL grey-whiskers!!! Possibly they would conclude that "we" are an insane asylum bursting with vitality!!! (To crib from Eric Voegelin here.)
To any person interested in the articulation of human symbols (e.g., cultural anthropologists, philosophers, et al.), there is no "might have that significance" to it. Plus I used the correct technical term for it, which is a fertility symbol, pointing to the life yet to come....
Thank you so much for writing!
887 posted on
12/10/2005 1:49:33 PM PST by
betty boop
(Dominus illuminatio mea.)
To: betty boop
[ Plus I used the correct technical term for it, which is a fertility symbol, pointing to the life yet to come.... ]
Phallus pointing to the life yet to come..
That comment could burn the eyes right out of a femi-nazi..after reading it..
You're dangerous..
890 posted on
12/10/2005 2:01:50 PM PST by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: betty boop
To any person interested in the articulation of human symbols (e.g., cultural anthropologists, philosophers, et al.), there is no "might have that significance" to it. Plus I used the correct technical term for it, which is a fertility symbol, pointing to the life yet to come.... I was serious, though, and not series. My beeber is not stuned.
How does one know that the artwork with phallic adornment was part of the piece as originally designed and executed?
933 posted on
12/10/2005 10:42:03 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson