You want it taught that ID is a legitimate scientific alternative to evolution. You want it taught that there is a controversy amongst biologists about evolution as a good explanation for the history and diversity of life. To judge from the comments I see here, many want it taught that evolution isn't even scientific or that science should not limit itself to naturalistic explanations. Some even appear to hold both positions, which I find curious.
While I find evolution in almost everything, I find that some kind of design or consistency in the laws of substance are also necessary for those who do science. What good would the law of gravity do, or Snell's law do, if the nature of mass and light were evolving?
There ARE things that E cannot or will not 'answer'. They are guesses, assumptions or hoped fors.
THIS is the area that ID addresses.