Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Fight Over Intelligent Design?
Foxnews.com/Cato ^ | November 22, 2005 | Andrew J. Coulson

Posted on 12/06/2005 11:55:32 AM PST by MRMEAN

Andrew J. Coulson is director of the Center for Educational Freedom at the Cato Institute.

Supporters of the theory of human origins known as "intelligent design" want it taught alongside the theory of evolution. Opponents will do anything to keep it out of science classrooms. The disagreement is clear.

But why does everyone assume that we must settle it through an ideological death-match in the town square?

Intelligent design contends that life on Earth is too complex to have evolved naturally, and so must be the product of an unspecified intelligent designer. Most adherents of this idea would undoubtedly be happy just to have it taught to their own children, and most of my fellow evolutionists presumably believe they should have that right. So why are we fighting?

We're fighting because the institution of public schooling forces us to, by permitting only one government-sanctioned explanation of human origins. The only way for one side to have its views reflected in the official curriculum is at the expense of the other side.

This manufactured conflict serves no public good. After all, does it really matter if some Americans believe intelligent design is a valid scientific theory while others see it as a Lamb of God in sheep's clothing? Surely not. While there are certainly issues on which consensus is key — respect for the rule of law and the rights of fellow citizens, tolerance of differing viewpoints, etc. — the origin of species is not one of them.

The sad truth is that state-run schooling has created a multitude of similarly pointless battles. Nothing is gained, for instance, by compelling conformity on school prayer, random drug testing, the set of religious holidays that are worth observing, or the most appropriate forms of sex education.

Not only are these conflicts unnecessary, they are socially corrosive. Every time we fight over the official government curriculum, it breeds more resentment and animosity within our communities. These public-schooling-induced battles have done much to inflame tensions between Red and Blue America.

But while Americans bicker incessantly over pedagogical teachings, we seldom fight over theological ones. The difference, of course, is that the Bill of Rights precludes the establishment of an official religion. Our founding fathers were prescient in calling for the separation of church and state, but failed to foresee the dire social consequences of entangling education and state. Those consequences are now all too apparent.

Fortunately, there is a way to end the cycle of educational violence: parental choice. Why not reorganize our schools so that parents can easily get the sort of education they value for their own children without having to force it on their neighbors?

Doing so would not be difficult. A combination of tax relief for middle income families and financial assistance for low-income families would give everyone access to the independent education marketplace. A few strokes of the legislative pen could thus bring peace along the entire "education front" of America's culture war.

But let's be honest. At least a few Americans see our recurrent battles over the government curriculum as a price worth paying. Even in the "land of the free," there is a temptation to seize the apparatus of state schooling and use it to proselytize our neighbors with our own ideas or beliefs.

In addition to being socially divisive and utterly incompatible with American ideals, such propagandizing is also ineffectual. After generations in which evolution has been public schooling's sole explanation of human origins, only a third of Americans consider it a theory well-supported by scientific evidence. By contrast, 51 percent of Americans believe "God created human beings in their present form."

These findings should give pause not only to evolutionists but to supporters of intelligent design as well. After all, if public schooling has made such a hash of teaching evolution, why expect it to do any better with I.D.?

Admittedly, the promotion of social harmony is an unusual justification for replacing public schools with parent-driven education markets. Most arguments for parental choice rest on the private sector's superior academic performance or cost-effectiveness. But when you stop and think about it, doesn't the combination of these advantages suggest that free markets would be a far more intelligent design for American education?

This article appeared on FOXNews.com on November 18, 2005.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: crevolist; intelligentdesign
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-271 next last
To: Bones75
 
Of course an intelligently designed bird would crap up!
 

21 posted on 12/06/2005 12:07:12 PM PST by HawaiianGecko (Facts are neither debatable nor open to "I have a right to this opinion" nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Gracias.


22 posted on 12/06/2005 12:07:22 PM PST by Junior (From now on, I'll stick to science, and leave the hunting alien mutants to the experts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Evolution Ping

The List-O-Links
A conservative, pro-evolution science list, now with over 320 names.
See the list's explanation, then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
To assist beginners: But it's "just a theory", Evo-Troll's Toolkit,
and How to argue against a scientific theory.

23 posted on 12/06/2005 12:09:47 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, common scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
Publik skools no best.
24 posted on 12/06/2005 12:09:48 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
Our founding fathers were prescient in calling for the separation of church and state, but failed to foresee the dire social consequences of entangling education and state. Those consequences are now all too apparent.

Not true. Benjamin Rush envisioned state run public schools where the Bible would be the primary textbook.

25 posted on 12/06/2005 12:09:48 PM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
Our founding fathers were prescient in calling for the separation of church and state, but failed to foresee the dire social consequences of entangling education and state.

***************

He's got that right.

26 posted on 12/06/2005 12:09:58 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN

We're fighting because we don't want bible-thumpers to get their collective noses under the tent.

The religeous ID folks have damaged the Pubbie party enough. No more.


27 posted on 12/06/2005 12:11:50 PM PST by MonroeDNA (Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA

So how does ID account for ear hair?


28 posted on 12/06/2005 12:12:55 PM PST by MonroeDNA (Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

What are the sales for evolution textbooks?

--or do the evolution authors donate their textbooks unlike the capitalist ID authors?


29 posted on 12/06/2005 12:13:32 PM PST by lonestar67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
Our founding fathers were prescient in calling for the separation of church and state, but failed to foresee the dire social consequences of entangling education and state.

An outstanding observation.

And a state monopoly on education is extremely wrong.

30 posted on 12/06/2005 12:14:17 PM PST by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
After generations in which evolution has been public schooling's sole explanation of human origins, only a third of Americans consider it a theory well-supported by scientific evidence. By contrast, 51 percent of Americans believe "God created human beings in their present form."

The problem is that sciecee isn't a democracy and the 51 percent of Americans who believe "God created human beings in their present form" are not 51 percent of scientists. It's not a matter of difference of opinion because science isn't a matter of opinion. Like the article says, these matters should give scientists pause, but for different reasons. It is because it is getting more and more obvious that we are not doing our best job of educating the public in basic scientific literacy. I'm not talking about evolution, but about scientific fundamentals. Perhaps it's because to understand much of modern science, it takes more than just quoting sound bites. The ID and creationsist types have done a very good job of co-opting scientific terminology and twisting it to suit their agenda and it does take quite a bit of knowledge to sift through a lot of the stuff that gets through. If we can't find a way to express that information to the general public in an easy to understand and quick to communicate way, the public will, by and large, remain truly in the dark about this subject.

31 posted on 12/06/2005 12:14:39 PM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Why Fight Over Intelligent Design?

Because there's never enough silly, pointless things to fight over.

32 posted on 12/06/2005 12:15:00 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Regicide

You would drown on your snot if it didn't come out.


33 posted on 12/06/2005 12:16:28 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Evolution is not a science to so many -- it is their religion, or world view. Actually, this is pretty silly. It is simply about science. Evolution is the best theory out there at the moment. Full of holes and problems, and who knows, perhaps someday it will be refuted in its entirety, but like the "solar system" model of the atom was in its day, it is the best model of reality we have today.

Not just that, but ID, REAL Intelligent Design theory isn't neccessarily mutually exclusive with much of evolutionary theory. It is simply the Creationists version of ID that does so. It is their proxy in this fight. A silly tactic, since ID theory would allow for ME (or some version of me, in a paralell universe) to have created the Universe.

34 posted on 12/06/2005 12:17:30 PM PST by Paradox (Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Dumbing down educational standards in science is neither silly nor pointless....


35 posted on 12/06/2005 12:17:30 PM PST by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Regicide
Our noses are placedupsidedown in the middle of our faces so that when we have colds, snot can run down right toward our mouths.

Yeah. And why do our breathing tube and our eating tube have to share space so we choke when eating? And why does the sewer pipe run through the recreation area?

36 posted on 12/06/2005 12:18:00 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Regicide

Go ahead and complete your design and build a working prototype. And we will see which functions best. Surely you can build a better prototype than an unintelligent design?

Also, it should be noted that less than perfect functionality does not imply unintelligence.
A honda civic being slower than a corvette does not imply the Honda engineers were unintelligent. Likewise a Hummer getting lower gas mileage than a nissan doesn't imply unintelligence either.

We know man was created suboptimally. For we were created "lower than the angels" who have vastly superior bodies, judging from some of the feats attributed to them. Not only were we created lower, but our bodies were then redesigned specifically to fail.

"Does the pot say to the potter, why have you made me thus?"


37 posted on 12/06/2005 12:18:16 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
They absolutely DO NOT want to allow ANYTHING other than evolution to be taught in schools.

Not so. We only insist that theories, laws and principles must first EARN standing in the marketplace of scientific ideas (i.e. prove sufficiently useful that they are taken up by scientists in the production of original scientific research, which status can be objectively confirmed in the professional literature) before they DESERVE a place in science curricula.

IOW it's an entirely normal CONSERVATIVE insistence on high and hard-nosed academic standards.

If ID (or any other view) genuinely succeeds as science, and thus earns a place in the curricula on merit, then we have no problem with that. You're just whining because you demand it's inclusion on the basis of intellectual affirmative action.

38 posted on 12/06/2005 12:18:33 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA

No, the pubbie party has damaged the bible thumpers.


39 posted on 12/06/2005 12:18:49 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pondman88
Here here!
40 posted on 12/06/2005 12:18:59 PM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-271 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson