That's funny...I figure if you think you've made any such case convincingly you are either naive, delusional or both.
Dis-aggregation and "downsizing" is the clear trend around the world today -- as more and more people understand that totalitarian governments are a necessity whenever people from different religious/cultural/ethnic backgrounds are thrown together and expected to live as a "nation." This is true whether we are talking about the harsh totalitarianism of Eastern Europe and the Middle East or the soft, lazy totalitarianism of a Western country like Canada. Paper nations like the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia have been consigned to the dustbin of history over the last 15 years, and the people in those places are better off today than they were before -- primarily because they were able to shed what were basically fraudulent notions of nationhood.
Why the U.S. thinks Iraq will be any different is beyond me. In fact, the U.S. quite specifically cannot promote real "freedom and democracy" in Iraq, since the people of Iraq -- if left to determine their futures independent of any outside influence -- would likely decide to break the country up.