Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy
I can't imagine why it was never provided for the 120mm.

That's easy...the M1 Tank was conceived first and last as a killer of other tanks (unlike earlier US tanks). That is why they gave it the gas turbine engine, the night vision systems, stabilized gun, and eventually that 120-mm Rheinmetal smoothbore.

Yeah but not supplying cannister is like leaving the .50 cal off the top, it trashes a tanks ability to defend itself alone against close in infantry.

So9

85 posted on 12/05/2005 12:52:19 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the 9
Yeah but not supplying cannister is like leaving the .50 cal off the top, it trashes a tanks ability to defend itself alone against close in infantry.

I would tend to agree, but that was the thinking back then. Also, the basic load of the M1 would have to be re-jiggered. How many HEAT or Sabots do you want to give up in favor of a few Beehive rounds? Plus, Soviet doctrine called for their infantry to be mounted (BMP & BTR's) because they were probably sliming you (Chemicals). You'd kill mounted infantry with HEAT. Frankly, the M1 does need better anti-infantry capability...

87 posted on 12/05/2005 1:07:31 PM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson