Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Servant of the 9
Yeah but not supplying cannister is like leaving the .50 cal off the top, it trashes a tanks ability to defend itself alone against close in infantry.

I would tend to agree, but that was the thinking back then. Also, the basic load of the M1 would have to be re-jiggered. How many HEAT or Sabots do you want to give up in favor of a few Beehive rounds? Plus, Soviet doctrine called for their infantry to be mounted (BMP & BTR's) because they were probably sliming you (Chemicals). You'd kill mounted infantry with HEAT. Frankly, the M1 does need better anti-infantry capability...

87 posted on 12/05/2005 1:07:31 PM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy

"Frankly, the M1 does need better anti-infantry capability..."

Bring back the flamethrower.


93 posted on 12/05/2005 2:38:37 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson