I guess that is an admission you have no argument, since you decided to go off on something that has nothing to do with the topic of the discussion.
I see you are also parroting DNC talking points on Katrina.
I see you are also parroting DNC talking points on Katrina.
Rubbish.
The topic is Bush's facetious, or otherwise, identifying Rice as his successor with his nickname. One of the objections to this is Bush's lapses into cronyism. Harriet Meirs and FEMA are examples. Do you think only democrats attacked Harriet Meirs? Are you really going to defend Brown as a choice? Lucky we had only a hurricane and not a nuclear strike. (That does not mean that I see Bush's performance in the hurricane as culpable, but it was a public relations disaster of the worst sort and completely predictable and avoidable. - so please spare me the insults about how I am an unfaithful republican.)
Here are my other objections to Rice which I posted in comment 20:
"What about FEMA? Apart from George Bush's imprimatur, Condi Rice, as estimable as she undeniably is, has not elective experience, is wrong on the cultural issues, and has the charisma of a moonrock. Only George Bush knows for sure, but then only George Bush knew for sure about Harriet Meirs."