Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No BCS for Oregon, which heads to Holiday Bowl
Oregonlive ^ | 12/4/2005, 6:12 p.m. PT | By BERNIE WILSON The Associated Press

Posted on 12/04/2005 7:37:12 PM PST by DuckFan4ever

SAN DIEGO (AP) — Spurned by the BCS, the Oregon Ducks had to settle for the next-best thing — a late-December trip to San Diego.

The No. 6 Ducks (10-1), whose only loss was to top-ranked USC, accepted an invitation to play Oklahoma in the Holiday Bowl on Dec. 29 after they were passed over for an at-large BCS berth.

"I think 'disappointed' is more the word than 'surprised,' " Oregon coach Mike Bellotti said on a conference call on Sunday.

"I didn't quite understand the Notre Dame deal. But obviously I have not been a student of the BCS," said Bellotti, whose Ducks were passed over for a shot at the national championship game four years ago.

Oregon was No. 5 in the final BCS standings, one spot ahead of Notre Dame. But Notre Dame has an easier shot at a BCS berth, including one stipulation that it be ranked three through six in the final BCS standings.

The Pac-10 had lobbied the BCS, specifically the Fiesta Bowl, on behalf of Oregon, which finished second in the conference to USC.

But Notre Dame and Ohio State, both 9-2, received bids to the Fiesta, which pays between $14 million and $17 million per team. The Holiday Bowl's payout is $2 million per team.

Last year, California was 10-1 but got bumped out of the Rose Bowl by Texas and went to the Holiday Bowl, losing 45-31 to Texas Tech.

As is often the case, the Holiday Bowl gets at least one team that thought it might have had a chance of playing in a bigger — and more lucrative — bowl.

"We couldn't be happier to have the No. 5-ranked team in the country in the BCS polls representing the Pac-10 in the Holiday Bowl," executive director Bruce Binkowski said. "We understand that that is their goal, to play in the BCS. But the system is the system. For us to have the opportunity to get the fifth-ranked team in the country is great. Also, we've never had Oklahoma before. They've had a great second half. We couldn't be happier with the matchup."

Oklahoma (7-4) won five of its last six games.

Oregon will play in the Holiday Bowl for the first time since 2000, when it beat Texas 35-30.

"Overall, we're excited about the Holiday Bowl," Bellotti said. "We had a great experience there the last time, in playing and defeating the University of Texas."

Oregon played Oklahoma last season and will play the Sooners again in 2006.

"I guess this will be a preview," Bellotti said.

Oklahoma coach Bob Stoops said the Ducks have a strong argument to be in a BCS bowl.

"They've had a great year," Stoops said. "They do a great job, 10-1, they only lost to USC. There's no question I could see where that would be difficult for them. But, of all places to go, the Holiday Bowl is an incredible destination."

Stoops has been to two previous Holiday Bowls, as a graduate assistant with Iowa in 1986 and an assistant coach with Kansas State in 1995.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: bcs; collegefootball; oregonducks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-180 next last
A Texan once told me the reason Texas doesn't float off into the Gulf of Mexico is because Oklahoma sucks. The Ducks are gonna kick some Big 12 Sooner butt!
1 posted on 12/04/2005 7:37:12 PM PST by DuckFan4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DuckFan4ever

Go Bucks !


2 posted on 12/04/2005 7:42:25 PM PST by buckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuckFan4ever

Mobilhoma


3 posted on 12/04/2005 7:43:59 PM PST by hispanarepublicana (Chuck Cooperstein is a tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuckFan4ever
Once more, the Pac Ten gets ...oh, you can finish the sentence
4 posted on 12/04/2005 7:44:15 PM PST by bybybill (GOD help us if the Rats win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuckFan4ever

We now return you to your regularly scheduled b****fest...

5 posted on 12/04/2005 7:44:35 PM PST by Senator Bedfellow (Sneering condescension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuckFan4ever

I take it everyone but me knows what a BCS is.


6 posted on 12/04/2005 7:47:42 PM PST by fish hawk (creatio ex nihilo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

ping


7 posted on 12/04/2005 7:48:12 PM PST by hispanarepublicana (Chuck Cooperstein is a tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

That's correct.


8 posted on 12/04/2005 7:50:36 PM PST by thoughtomator (What'ya mean you formatted the cat!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DuckFan4ever

Aww... they didn't get into the BCS. Their conference is still gonna get $14 Million, split amongst 10 teams... not bad.

Try being a fan of a non-BCS team, who starts the season with practically NO CHANCE of being national champion, because even if we go 11-0, the pollsters would never vote us #1 or #2.


9 posted on 12/04/2005 7:50:55 PM PST by mwyounce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
Sure, it's a system designed to do all it can to prevent an undisputed national champion, and it has a pretty good historical record too. It only failed to cause dispute and confusion this year because exactly two teams were #1 and 2 wire to wire, with multi-year undefeated streaks against numerous ranked opponents. But they'll try again next year!

Here's the Wikipedia entry, if you wanted a serious answer.
10 posted on 12/04/2005 7:51:46 PM PST by Turbopilot (Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mwyounce

Still not as bad as being a fan of a BCS team who starts the season with practically no chance of being national champion because they lose too many games :-p


11 posted on 12/04/2005 7:53:16 PM PST by Turbopilot (Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
Once more, the Pac Ten gets ...

...what it deserves.

12 posted on 12/04/2005 7:54:45 PM PST by Tall_Texan (HOUSTON ASTROS - NATIONAL LEAGUE CHAMPIONS 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot

Ho, Ho, Ho, Ho,
The BCS must go, go, go.

:)


13 posted on 12/04/2005 7:55:07 PM PST by writer33 (Rush Limbaugh walks in the footsteps of giants: George Washington, Thomas Paine and Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DuckFan4ever
"I didn't quite understand the Notre Dame deal. But obviously I have not been a student of the BCS,"

BCS: Bucks, Cash, Simoleons.... Notre Dame will generate bigger receipts than Oregon will.

14 posted on 12/04/2005 7:59:34 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuckFan4ever
Well, with only eight BCS slots and only two not dedicated to either the national championship or certain conference champions, it is almost a certainty that one or two deserving teams is going to get left out every year.

However, I don't think Notre Dame should be in a BCS game. IMHO, Notre Dame is always given special treatment by the pollsters and the BCS and will probably get a BCS berth every year that the BCS can get away with it no matter how many loses they have.

15 posted on 12/04/2005 8:02:38 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Those Who Want to Impeach President Bush Are the Party of Treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuckFan4ever

You wanna bet????????? ;-)


16 posted on 12/04/2005 8:06:10 PM PST by dmw (BOOOOOOOOOOMER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SOOOOOOOOOOOONER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow

Your little texas thingy is upside down. ;-)


17 posted on 12/04/2005 8:07:42 PM PST by dmw (BOOOOOOOOOOMER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SOOOOOOOOOOOONER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow

That longhorn logo looks like it was modeled after the female reproductive organs.


18 posted on 12/04/2005 8:09:53 PM PST by DuckFan4ever (Janice Rogers Brown for the Supreme court in '06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dmw

Give 'em hell, eh? :)


19 posted on 12/04/2005 8:12:58 PM PST by Senator Bedfellow (Sneering condescension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DuckFan4ever
Quack.

Enjoy - I'm outta here :)

20 posted on 12/04/2005 8:13:28 PM PST by Senator Bedfellow (Sneering condescension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-180 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson