Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The current crop of scaredy cat republicans in congress, with the exception of a very few, have a bad case of Rockefeller Republicanitis,which can be fatal in off year elections.
120 posted on
12/03/2005 10:07:10 AM PST by
gitmogrunt
(Oppose One "Farce" at the Border)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks for the ping on this, GLGB. Would have missed it.
123 posted on
12/03/2005 10:20:28 AM PST by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Good for Tony. He's right. We've been weakened by a lot of gutless GOP'ers. We send back the request for funds now.
128 posted on
12/03/2005 10:41:55 AM PST by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush. He's done more for our country than we will ever know. He's the man!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Guess Tony Snow is now a traitor too...lol
I haven't looked downthread yet....is he being roasted yet as a fool and disloyal etc?
hope no one calls him Paleo...the horror
130 posted on
12/03/2005 10:49:53 AM PST by
wardaddy
(Merry Christmas ya'll)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I hope that someone in Congress listens to Tony Snow. This is a time in our history when we need to be speaking out and taking action that leads to less reliance on government.
Government is not the savior that so many Americans think it is. They can do so much better for themselves than government will ever think of doing for them - let alone actually do for them. The GOP is missing in action on this historic opportunity!
137 posted on
12/03/2005 11:15:50 AM PST by
Sunsong
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The GOP does have some very strong-minded conservatives who want to do the right thing for the USA on important issues like trade, globalism, spending and immigration but I'm afraid the Rockefeller Republicans are running the show.
To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; VPMWife78; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; xflisa; ...
FoxFan ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.
142 posted on
12/03/2005 11:35:26 AM PST by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Virtually every time the ACLU files a lawsuit, Democrats lose supporters. Despite these advantages, however, the GOP founders Virtually every time the ACLU "wins", the ruling itself is unconstitutional. Such as the Federal rulings regarding State involvement in prayer or the Ten Commandments. No Federal judge has any jurisdiction whatsoever in determining whether a State legislature can start sessions with denominational prayers, unless Congress specifically prohibits it. It is a violation of the 1st and 10th Amendments. But the GOP won't do the obvious--nullification.
For example, Indiana Republicans must SAY CLEARLY they will IGNORE the recent ruling outlawing such prayers. Similarly, the President has no obligation to enforce any ruling of the SCOTUS which he himself determines to be in violation of the Constitution. Nullification is the answer to quickly cut the liberal judicial coup off at the knees.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
You guys and gals already knew this but im pinging ya to let you know someone finaly said it out loud !
Pings
147 posted on
12/03/2005 12:07:15 PM PST by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
To: governsleastgovernsbest; Tony Snow
TS...on the mark! We desperately need several "Hammers."
148 posted on
12/03/2005 12:07:26 PM PST by
hummingbird
(Think I'll google for a while.....on FRED THOMPSON for a seat on the SUPREME COURT!)
To: Borax Queen
Politicians who run just to protect incumbency may save their seats, but only by destroying their party's heart and soul. If you really want to build lasting power in politics, you need to forget about mere incumbency -- and remember the principles that got you elected in the first place. Bump!
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Wow! I've been so busy I didn't see this until now, but I am certainly glad I caught it, and that you posted it.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I'm glad somone in the media finally said it. They are cowards and not doing what they were elected to do.
To: The Drowning Witch
220 posted on
12/03/2005 5:12:29 PM PST by
Jackknife
( "I bet after seeing us, George Washington would sue us for calling him 'father'." —Will Rogers)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Bush insiders even began boasting about "big government" conservatism -- oblivious to the fact that big government does not conserve or preserve; it crushes and digests, devouring institutions that challenge its supremacy. Tony Snow for President.
221 posted on
12/03/2005 5:13:38 PM PST by
alrea
To: governsleastgovernsbest
you need to forget about mere incumbency and forget socialists in the media
224 posted on
12/03/2005 5:17:22 PM PST by
alrea
To: governsleastgovernsbest
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Republicans drew the wrong morals from the decline and fall of Newt Gingrich. They thought his boldness got him in trouble, and chose to crib plays from the Bill Clinton playbook -- tacking left, at least oratorically, so as to appease, rather than confront, their critics. Hence, George W. Bush's "compassionate conservatism" Let's not rewrite history. Newt in '95 had his head handed to him. Week after week in '95 the MSM dug into the conservative Contract with America and they dug into Newt. Week after week the polls got lower for Newt until he was left a neutered Newt. Conservatism and Contract were left in shambles.
Were the polls correct? Did the electorate run away from Newt and his contract? If the polls were correct, then why should any politician give a rats rear-end about conservatism?
2008 is approaching. The MSM is losing power. Talk radio and the Internet are now places where many can get unbiased information.
All you folks want to try this all over again. All you folks want to see a good conservative running for president in 2008 and a contract with America-type congressional run in 2006.
Maybe now's the time -- maybe.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson