Posted on 12/02/2005 3:04:41 PM PST by NYer
Honolulu, Dec. 02, 2005 (CNA) - Yesterday, the Hawaii state Supreme Court handed over a precedent-setting opinion, ruling that 32-year old Tayshea Aiwohi could not be convicted of killing her unborn child, because at the time, it was not a person.
In July of 2001, Aiwohi gave birth to her son, Treyson, who died two days later due to his mothers use of methamphetamine while she was pregnant.
She was initially convicted of manslaughter but was able to appeal the decision all the way to the high court. To date, no appeals court in the U.S. has ever upheld an manslaughter charge for a mother who caused the death of her child while pregnant.
In their Thursday decision, all five of Hawaiis Supreme Court Justices agreed that the charge should be overturned because, they said, the child was not a person when Aiwohi smoked the drug.
When he was born, Treyson was found to have had high levels of methamphetamine in his system and Aiwohi even admitted to having taken a hit on the morning of his birth.
According to the Honolulu Advertiser, City Deputy Prosecutor Glenn Kim, who handled the trial and appeal, was disappointed in the decision. "We continue to believe that babies such as Treyson Aiwohi deserve the protection of the law," he said.
"And we also continue to believe that people like Tayshea Aiwohi doing what she did to her baby continue to deserve to suffer the consequences of the law for those actions."
When Monsignor George Talbot (who later went mad) quipped that the job of the laity was "to hunt, to shoot, to entertain" Newman responded that the Church would look awfully silly without them. The quip is the title of a book on clericalism by Russell Shaw that more people should read.
Very good, right to the heart of the matter and your logic is impeccable.
This is the truth: According to Barbara Boxer in a live interview I heard with my own ears: a baby does not become a person until the Mother exits the hospital with her infant!! Anything within the hospital is fair game in Boxer's mind.
Duh! Funny! Read the line before it: "...whatever one chooses to call it, ("it") has rights as any individual human being has - Because it is a human and not some other creature."
I was making the point that whatever those pro-abortion - anti-life people choose to call the unborn (and now - born) baby(ies), "it" will Always be a human or as you said humans - I wasn't talking about the numbers!
And when I said "evolve" - I should have put the quotation marks around the word evolve because those same types of people don't beleive in "development" - they believe in "evolution!"
Mrs. Don-o - If I "muture" much more - I may be exiting this world!
Obviously if a woman had a 'miscarriage' that occured before the embryo has developed sufficiently to be visible, the miscarriage would have been a non-event as nobody would have known about it.
On the other hand, a woman who had a miscarriage later in her pregnancy--but still before she would have otherwise known she was pregnant--could very well become aware of it.
Applying the principles of common law, IMHO, would suggest that if the heartbeat of the fetus is detectable, it should be construed as a person, but probably not before that. After all, if the heartbeat is detectable, one can tell that the fetus is alive at the moment one is 'looking'. If there is no detectable heartbeat, it may be difficult to determine that the embryo is still alive (obviously it must have been alive to reach whatever stage of development it's in, but instantaneous determination of life is much trickier).
Oh REALLY?? Was it a puppy?
Then why is it illegal to get an abortion after a certain date of being pregnant? It's a baby not a fetus.
This ruling in HI is just as despicable as Roe and Griswold, which set up the so-called "right to privacy"--the only judicially-recognized absolute right that "exists" in the Constitiution solely by judicial fiat)
But while the "Right to Privacy" might be manifest in this ruling, it's a lot more like Dred Scott v. Sandford, in which SCOTUS, under the Taney Court, attempted to define human beings along racial lines, namely that African-Americans were property and not human beings. Then, look what happened--a few years later, the bloody Civil War broke out.
It's clear that Dred Scott was so controversial it literally led to civil anguish, which inturn bred civil war. And it was because the Court attempted to squarely define who was human.
That said, it is not to any organ of Government, nor to Society to define humanity, but to the Natural and Moral Laws given to us by God, who is the Author of Life.
Ironically, this supports my assertion.
Don't get me wrong..The layity is also a member of the church body. But we're the sheep and they're the shepards. In discussion, the phrase "The Church" typically means the clergy..(at least when discussing the Catholic Church). It's just how it's always been discused - because the power in the Catholic church is with the clergy. Lay there have no voting rights etc. I think this clear separation of lay and clergy has protected the church for so long, where some other churches have more or less been gang-rushed by the layity, and well, are not doing so well today (you know those rainbow churches etc.) Secondly, the fact that all Bishops are answerable to one man has made for easy dispute resolution through the ages and kept things pretty uniform.
Thank you!
I read somewhere, though, that the Jewish faith approves of abortion. Is that true?
Careful there ... slippery slope.
In France, a child sued his mother for not aborting him, and won!
"Then why is it illegal to get an abortion after a certain date of being pregnant? It's a baby not a fetus."
I agree. It is a baby~!! The word fetus is a latin word meaning BABY. The use of the word *fetus* is to DE-HUMANIZE the baby, imo. I'm not so sure that abortion is illegal after a certain date. I know that some states allow for late term abortions such as Florida.
Early this year a woman went to Florida seeking a 2nd or 3rd term abortion. The woman was given an injection through her stomach that should have killed the baby. Hours later she was then given a drug to create labor. Apparently the injection/shot, missed it's mark and didn't kill the baby as planned. The woman actually delivered the baby alive. There was NO doctor on duty at the hedious clinic. The baby lived for a few minutes. He was born on the bathroom floor of the clinic.
I saw a picture of the baby online. In fact, it was here on FR that I read about the baby. Most likely the baby could have survived with the proper care. A friend of mine's daughter had a baby premature 6 1/2 months recently. She was only two pounds and is doing great. The mother who wanted her baby aborted was outraged that her baby didn't die before it was born. She may have sued the abortion clinic. I'll never forget seeing that photo of that sweet little dead baby. So sad.
Boxer was being pinned into a corner during a debate (by someone I don't remember his name) on partial birth abortion. He was trying to get her to commit to exactly what point it is considered murder. In her stuttering, stupid way, it finally came out when the mother left the hospital. I'll never forget that debate. It should be heard by everyone.
<< Tayshea Aiwohi could not be convicted of killing her unborn child, because at the time, it was not a person. >>
In Hawaii, a two day-old child is not a person?
In abjectly "Democrat" Hawaii, a judge has not a brain.
I guess every one is a member of the newly discovered ancient "native hawaian" tribe and is therefore not required to study United States Constitutional Law at law school?
And wouldn't know an American Declaration of Independence, Constitution or Bill of Rights if one of them bit him in the arse?
<< And I thought things were bad in the 60's when I grew up ........ >>
Things were.
And now they're judges on various state and federal courts.
And are "teachers" and "professors" at schools, colleges and universities.
Dear God in Heaven! - Indeed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.