He said the irony is delicious. Not that their deaths would be, and yes there is a fine line there.
I think it is dangerous to consider these people innocents. To me they are allied with the terrorists when they make claims that if it were not for the "occupation" that they would not be in harm today. I think they are misguided idealogues at best, and at worst traitors to their religion (if they are indeed practicing Christians) and to humanity. To place zero blame on the terrorists, and 100% of the blame on us is laughable.
This is telling: There was not a PEEP from these people when the rape rooms and shredders were having their way with Saddam's victims.
Why ?
Because socialist doctrine is that they stick up for each other, no matter the offense.
It's as true for Clinton as it was for Saddam.
From Havana to Baghdad to Caracas socialists will defend the worst of the worst in order to see a fellow socialist wield power.
"He said the irony is delicious. Not that their deaths would be, and yes there is a fine line there.
I think it is dangerous to consider these people innocents. To me they are allied with the terrorists when they make claims that if it were not for the "occupation" that they would not be in harm today. I think they are misguided idealogues at best, and at worst traitors to their religion (if they are indeed practicing Christians) and to humanity. To place zero blame on the terrorists, and 100% of the blame on us is laughable.
This is telling: There was not a PEEP from these people when the rape rooms and shredders were having their way with Saddam's victims."
The Brits and the American are traitors. They have actively sought to give aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war.
They are mostly Quakers, Mennonites, and Church of the Brethren.