Didn't Richard Miniter in his book "Disinformation" document that there were in fact WMD's found in Iraq.
And as memory serves there have been a couple of news articles posted on FR documenting the WMD's found in Iraq.
Why is everyone still denying it??
Semper Fi,
Kelly
doesn't count. they weren't "stockpiles"
Because the media said there would be huge vats of deadly liquids being stirred by Saddam, in a huge factory, and our 150,000, military were going to sneak up behind him!
Just like in the movies, you know, 007!
Perhaps we should change the WMD term to Kerry's massive "weapons of individual destruction." `
Because it is very embarrassing for libs to acknowledge reality. You can't even get them to acknowledge what happened to the Kurds. Logically one would assume that considering what he has done and his failure to reveal all his wmd programs that fair observers would conclude that Hussein was a menace and had to be taken out. I will wager that there is not one Dem or lib who protested Clinton's words and actions in '98 concerning Hussein and his wmds.
The fact is the current president is a Republican. Therefore Hussein can not now be or ever have been a threat, and he never had wmds or did anything bad. It's like the situation in "1984" when history was wiped our or revised to fit the present needs of Big Brother and his minions. End of story.