Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
I understand the Welsh and Scots didn't think so highly of him.
He wasn't so "saintly" to them.
7 posted on 12/01/2005 6:21:03 PM PST by starfish923 (Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: starfish923
I understand the Welsh and Scots didn't think so highly of him.

That's Edward the First. A few centuries after Edward the Confessor.

14 posted on 12/01/2005 7:10:52 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: starfish923
He wasn't so "saintly" to them.

They probably liked him better than they liked William the Bastard.

17 posted on 12/01/2005 8:01:26 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: starfish923

You're thinking of Edward I, son of Henry III, I believe, aka Edward Longshanks, aka Edward the Hammer of the Scots.


21 posted on 12/01/2005 8:35:56 PM PST by wimpycat (Hyperbole is the opiate of the activist wacko.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: starfish923

"I understand the Welsh and Scots didn't think so highly of him."

The Welsh and Scots don't think so highly of anything to do with England, except maybe for the doles so many of them gladly accept.


28 posted on 12/01/2005 8:52:27 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson