To: Alberta's Child
Actually, you don't. You simply need a basic determination -- either through scientific means or through cultural acceptance -- that an unborn child is a person. That's exactly why the Federal government would have the power -- actually the obligation -- to outlaw abortion under the 14th Amendment. So you support the Court creating a right merely based on science? I would argue that is for the legislature and state to do via Constitional Amendment.
46 posted on
12/01/2005 9:24:37 AM PST by
LWalk18
To: LWalk18
Every law has some basis in "science" whether we recognize it or not. The mere fact that a medical examiner is needed to determine the time or manner of death in a murder case makes this obvious.
49 posted on
12/01/2005 9:29:50 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
(What it all boils down to is that no one's really got it figured out just yet.)
To: LWalk18
So you support the Court creating a right merely based on science? I would argue that is for the legislature and state to do via Constitional Amendment. They wouldn't be creating a new right, but rather using science to determine whether an existing right applied to a given group.
51 posted on
12/01/2005 9:42:55 AM PST by
Fatalist
(60 in 06)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson