Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/30/2005 8:29:10 PM PST by CAWats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CAWats

Probably buried as business expenses...


2 posted on 11/30/2005 8:32:09 PM PST by Buck W. (Yesterday's Intelligentsia are today's Irrelevantsia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats
People would buy plaid polyester leisure suits if you offered them for sale. So what?
3 posted on 11/30/2005 8:32:27 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats

Could these numbers be harder to disprove than circulation claims of the regular old newpaper?


4 posted on 11/30/2005 8:33:06 PM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats

The hard core liberals want the NYT. It doesn't matter to them if they have to pay for it or not. They need to feel superior to the rest of us by being a NYT reader.


7 posted on 11/30/2005 8:50:33 PM PST by GodfearingTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats

I'd expect the NYT opinion pages to get more shrill as they aim to please this paying audience. It will become even more an echo chamber for a small and dwindling crowd.


11 posted on 11/30/2005 8:58:54 PM PST by Monti Cello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats
numbers of readers are paying for online content that used to be free.

Two, twelve and zero are numbers.

12 posted on 11/30/2005 9:00:49 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats
Another critic is Mickey Kaus, a well-read blogger who writes a lot about the media. He says the paper is shooting itself in the foot by charging for columns. He says the columns were influential because anyone could read them for free online. If fewer people read them because of a subscription fee, then these columnists will be less influential.

They sure carry a lot of weight around here! /sarc.

14 posted on 11/30/2005 9:14:32 PM PST by SouthTexas (What part of NO don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats
ANYONE could still read Maureen Dowd for free on the Internet if they put a little (very little) effort into it!
16 posted on 11/30/2005 9:35:36 PM PST by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats

The Slimes has implemented this service in a very clever way. They have a photo for each feature and present a tantalizing title which makes you want to click it. If 5% of people pay for it, they will make a mint.


19 posted on 11/30/2005 10:30:33 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats

The Slimes has implemented this service in a very clever way. They have a photo for each feature and present a tantalizing title which makes you want to click it. If 5% of people pay for it, they will make a mint.


20 posted on 11/30/2005 10:30:43 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats
So liberals pay now for content they can read for free in the print edition? Liberal content no one cares about? Yeah, right. Yawn>

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

21 posted on 11/30/2005 10:32:27 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats

You have a lot of people stuck on stupid if they are paying for something that a simple search will bring up free. Most of the articles are featured on other newspapers are are on line for free.

I like it, personally, since it limits readership and their views get buried.


23 posted on 12/01/2005 4:58:07 AM PST by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats

If the content had any value, it might be worth something.


24 posted on 12/01/2005 5:00:58 AM PST by MortMan (Eschew Obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAWats

25 posted on 12/01/2005 5:11:17 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson