Posted on 11/30/2005 10:51:13 AM PST by HAL9000
French anti-racist organizations are planning to sue Jean-Marie Le Pen, the French extreme-right party leader after he again dismissed the Nazi gas chambers as “a detail”.Le Pen made the renewed comments during an interview on the BBC’s Hardtalk show which focused on the recent riots in France’s suburbs.
He had originally caused anger amongst Jews and anti-racism campaigners alike when he first made a similar comment in 1987.
Mere detail
During the one-on-one interview Stephen Sackur, the show’s host, recalled that less than a year ago Le Pen “described the Nazi occupation of France as ’not particularly inhuman’" and “the holocaust as a mere detail of history,”
Le Pen jumped to his own defence. "That’s not the same thing. No, I didn’t say that. I shall tell you exactly what I said. I said the gas chambers were a detail of the history of the World War," he replied.
"And this is true. None of the leaders - Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin or De Gaulle - ever mentioned the gas chambers in their memoirs," the far right leader added.
In 1987, Le Pen stated on RTL radio that the Nazi gas chambers were "detail of WWII history." At the time he was condemned by a French court to pay a 183,200 euros fine, because of the mistake he made in "trivializing" the persecutions perpetrated by the Nazis.
Racist tendancies
Speaking about immigrants in France and their difficulties of finding jobs, Le Pen pointed out that "these people have a reputation for being fairly incompetent in work, being aggressive, and often being hostile.”
Le Pen added that there was no need of being "surprised to find that employers tend not to recruit them, in preference to people of French descent."
When Sackur replied to him that when he would "say things like that it’s not hard to see why a majority in France see you as a racist and an Anti-Semite."
Scandalised
SOS Racisme, UEJF, the French Union of Jewish Students, the Licra, the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism, and the MRAP, the Movement against Racism and for Friendship among the peoples sued Jean-Marie Le Pen for maintening his gas chambers comments being a "detail of WWII history."
"We are scandalized, it is unbelievable that the leaders of the Front National continue to declare that gas chambers are just a detail of history," Marilou Jampolsky, SOS Racisme spokesperson told EJP.
"The fact that it is a repeat offence and that he had been condemned in the past for such statements, this affaire will go quicker and the condemnation will be heavier," she added.
"Le Pen confirms and validates the anti-Semitic and revisionist nature of the Front National. These statements are not only extremely grave but they were held abroad in order to avoid the French legislation and to send a European message to all the revisionists in Europe," Mouloud Aounit, the MRAP Chairman said.
BBC response
Bridget Osborne, Hardtalk producer told EJP that the BBC did not want to do a sensationalist show, "we interviewed Le Pen because he was the second most important candidate in France during the 2002 presidential elections," she said.
"I do not see the difference between saying ’the Holocaust was a detail of history’ and saying that ’gas chambers was a detail of history’," she added.
"Through the interview, Stephen tried to show the inconsistency of Le Pen rhetoric and I think he has done a pretty good job."
On Tuesday, the French socialist party expressed its "indignation" in regard to Le Pen’s gas chambers statement.
Contacted by EJP, the CRIF, the French Jewish umbrella organization, refused to comment on Le Pen statement, "in order not to give him publicity."
Is this a screwy French law or a screwy British law that lets them do this?
ping
Is there some strange force of nature in France that repels common sense?
French law. No such thing as freedom of speech there.
The same people suing Le Pen are the same who consider 100 million or so dead from marxism "a detail"
I should note, I do not agree with Le Pen's opinions on the holocaust, just his right to say what he wishes about it.
Since it was broadcast on British airwaves, it appears that they don't recognize territorial boundaries, either.
We must tell the Algerians that it is not the case that they need France, but that France needs them. They are not a burden, and if they are for now, they will on the contrary be a dynamic part as well as the young blood of the French nation into which we will have integrated them. I claim that in the Muslim religion there is nothing, in the moral point of view, that would be incompatible with making a believing or practicing Muslim a full French citizen. Very much on the contrary, its basic principles are the same as for Christianity, which is the basis of Western civilization. On the other hand, I do not believe that there exists an Algerian race, any more than there exists a French race... I conclude: let us offer to Algerian Muslims entrance and integration in a dynamic France. Instead of telling them as we do now: "you are very expensive, you are a burden", let us tell them: "we need you, you are the youth of the nation".
-- Jean-Marie Le Pen, Journal officiel de la République française, January 28, 1958
Actually, no. Since they are the Marxists, they consider the 100 million dead to have been justified. Some of them probably actively worked to make some of those people dead, and left the Soviet Union before the place fell apart.
Communists are psychopaths. They never quit. And any principaled resistance to them - such as the Front National - will be steamrollered by any means possible, such as ludicrous lawsuits.
The same people suing Le Pen are the same who consider 100 million or so dead from marxism "a detail"
Actually, no. Since they are the Marxists, they consider the 100 million dead to have been justified. Some of them probably actively worked to make some of those people dead, and left the Soviet Union before the place fell apart.
Communists are psychopaths. They never quit. And any principaled resistance to them - such as the Front National - will be steamrollered by any means possible, such as ludicrous lawsuits.
*If speech isn't politically correct, and it does not conform to the Marxist prescripton, then it must be suppressed by using the courts as a weapon. As we have observed aggressive legal actions by the ACLU, the premier proMaxist/communist front organization in America.
He may or may not be a racist, but as a politician, he's a dumbass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.