1 posted on
11/29/2005 3:03:38 PM PST by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I've always found the entire concept of regulations governing conduct during war to be somewhat odd. War isn't a game like golf where the stronger or more skilled adversary handicaps themself to make it a more even contest.
To: neverdem
The only reason that we ever incur civilian casualties in military operations is because the enemy makes a practice of surrounding their combatants with civilians.
We would be abhorred at the thought of using women and kids as human shields. We would never do that in a million years. They would. They do.
3 posted on
11/29/2005 3:11:14 PM PST by
Sender
(Team Infidel USA)
To: neverdem
I think it was Golda Meir who once said "We can forgive you for killing our children, but we can never forgive you for making us kill yours."
4 posted on
11/29/2005 3:13:00 PM PST by
Sender
(Team Infidel USA)
To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; King Prout; ..
5 posted on
11/29/2005 3:14:23 PM PST by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
6 posted on
11/29/2005 3:15:05 PM PST by
knews_hound
(i know my typing sucks, i do it one handed ! (caps are azy.e crespecially tough))
To: neverdem
7 posted on
11/29/2005 3:16:22 PM PST by
nopardons
To: neverdem
It's not enough that it sometimes seems like whenever we bomb a terrorist safe house we're accused of killing 40 civilians and no terrorists.I've always found these claims odd. Some victims of an attack, children and so forth, are obviously innocent.
Beyond these definite cases, how anybody can tell whether a dead guy was a terrorist or not is perplexing. By definition, they don't wear insignia.
Even some women are terrorists themselves and many more support them.
9 posted on
11/29/2005 3:27:01 PM PST by
Restorer
(They want to die. We want to kill them. Cool!)
To: neverdem
Teargas, mace, and pepper spray is routinely used to disperse crowds here in the U.S. Why aren't people complaining about those "chemical weapons" used by police? I'm really shocked that Jackson, Sharpton, or Farrakahn hasn't objected to the fact that "white" phosphorous is being used against brown people.
11 posted on
11/29/2005 4:33:29 PM PST by
edpc
To: neverdem
WP burns on contact with air and is highly useful for smoke-screening, smoke-marking, and as an anti-personnel weapon.
As opposed to bullets which tickle and make one laugh.
The first hint of BS should have been detected with 'Italian Documentary Maker'. Lord knows a documentary maker would never lie or mislead.....
![](http://gobnf.org/i/rg/robert_greenwald.jpg)
![](http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronicle/02/4.11.02/Moore-State.JPG)
12 posted on
11/29/2005 4:37:05 PM PST by
proud_yank
(Experience Tolerance: tell a liberal you own guns and drive an SUV!)
To: neverdem
Just another big lie application.
14 posted on
11/29/2005 9:45:10 PM PST by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson