Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge

the FCC might be able to fanagle their way into regulating cable, but I would say that satellites are well out of their jurisdiction.


23 posted on 11/29/2005 3:21:02 PM PST by meyer (Dems are stuck on stupid. Al Gore invented stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: meyer
"the FCC might be able to fanagle their way into regulating cable, but I would say that satellites are well out of their jurisdiction."

Wasn't there a case a few years ago where some state like Tennessee or Alabama, or somewhere, brought a lawsuit against not only some porno satellite channel, but also the "stars" themselves?

Seems like someone thought that broadcasting smut onto "their" turf was a punishable offense.

40 posted on 11/29/2005 3:46:23 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: meyer

What about if it has been to a bird before the cable company sends it to my house?


60 posted on 11/29/2005 4:29:51 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: meyer
the FCC might be able to fanagle their way into regulating cable, but I would say that satellites are well out of their jurisdiction.

Don't bet on it. Those satellites don't function without an earth station uplink. RF transmission is under the control of the FCC. Most studio/transmitter links are RF too. Again, the FCC has jurisdiction. The FCC also regulates common carrier services (phone companies) that carry studio links (audio/video/control).

67 posted on 11/29/2005 4:44:38 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson